检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王晓龙[1] 郭志伟[1] WANG Xiao-long;GUO Zhi-wei(Song History Research Center,Hebei University,Baoding 071002,China)
出 处:《河北学刊》2023年第3期90-98,共9页Hebei Academic Journal
基 金:2019年度国家社会科学基金一般项目“宋代地方政府与民间经营资本关系研究”(2019BZS044)。
摘 要:北宋以来,地方财税项目不断被中央侵夺,逐渐形成了强大的中央财政集权体制。宋夏战争时期,由于庞大的开销造成了地方政府财政的窘迫局面,越来越多的士大夫关注于公使钱在地方财政中的作用。为解决边境州军犒赏经费紧张的局面,部分边臣加强了对公使钱的管理和经营。其中出现的种种“违规”行为,使中央政府认识到严格管理地方财政的重要性,故在台谏官的弹劾下酿成多起公案。面对中央政府的“掠夺”行为,地方政府同样采取多种方式来增加公使钱与之博弈,从而导致中央政府与地方政府在财权分配上的矛盾不断加深。In the Northern Song Dynasty,local fiscal and tax projects were constantly encroached by the central government,and a strong centralized financial system was gradually formed.In order to solve the shortage of reward funds for the border state army,some border generals strengthened the management and management of the entertainment allowance.All kinds of“violations”made the central government realize the importance of strict management of local finance,so many public cases were caused under the impeachment of the remonstrators.In the face of the“predatory”behavior of the central government,the local governments also took various ways to increase the amount of money played by the entertainment allowance,which led to the deepening of the contradiction between the central government and the local governments in the distribution of financial rights.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49