中国科研不端治理机制的审视与调整  

Review of the governance mechanism of scientific research misconduct in China and suggestion

作　　者：吴何奇 孙元君 WU Heqi;SUN Yuanjun(School of Criminal Justice,Shanghai University of Political Science and Law.Shanghai 201701,China;School of Law,Shanghai University of Finance and Economics,Shanghai 200433,China)

机构地区：[1]上海政法学院刑事司法学院,上海201701 [2]上海财经大学法学院,上海200433

出　　处：《科技导报》2023年第7期28-36,共9页Science & Technology Review

基　　金：上海市“科技创新行动计划”软科学研究项目(22692194000);最高人民法院司法研究重大课题(Z9FYZDKT202210-01)。

摘　　要：针对科研不端,中国已建立起以立法、规范性文件和部门规章为依据的科研不端治理机制。但现行的科研不端治理机制仍在事前、事中、事后存在问题,具体体现于科研数据管理、调查处理模式、惩戒措施等方面。梳理了国外科研不端治理的有益经验,分析了中国科研不端的成因与治理机制存在的问题,指出应侧重建立多元的科研评价机制、完善科研数据管理机制、设立独立的科研不端监管部门、细化科研不端的惩处。To address scientific misconduct China has established a governance mechanism based on legislation,normative documents and departmental rules.However,the current governance mechanism of scientific research misconduct still has problems in the whole cycle(before,during and after the event),which are specifically reflected in scientific research data management,investigation and processing modes,disciplinary measures,etc.This paper combs the beneficial experience of foreign countries in these respects,analyzes the causes of China's scientific research misconduct and the problems in the governance mechanism,provides a reference for adjusting China's scientific research misconduct governance mechanism,and points out that we should focus on establishing a diversified scientific research evaluation mechanism,improving scientific research data management mechanism,establishing an independent regulatory department to deal with scientific research misconduct,and refining the punishment for scientific research misconduct.

关 键 词：科研不端 《科技进步法》 科研评价 

分 类 号：G322[文化科学]