检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:储永正 李伦 CHU Yongzheng;LI Lun(College of International Studies,National University of Defense Technology,Nanjing 210039,China)
机构地区:[1]国防科技大学国际关系学院,江苏南京210039
出 处:《国防科技》2023年第2期99-108,共10页National Defense Technology
基 金:国家社会科学基金军事学项目(156J003-091);军队科研基金(21-xxxxxx-083)。
摘 要:美国《国防战略》报告的演变本质上是美国近年来战略重心不断调整的具体表现,尤其是在当今全球地缘政治和经济中心不断向亚太转移的背景下,美国国家安全的重点完全从以往应对“恐怖主义”转向如今的“大国竞争”。事实上,作为美国《国家安全战略》报告的重要延伸,《国防战略》报告已经成为美国历届政府维系其“唯一超级大国”地位的重要抓手。在对比奥巴马执政以来美国三份国防战略报告内容变化的基础上,重点对当前拜登政府新版《国防战略》报告进行研判分析,旨在为新时代处理中美关系,尤其是国防军事关系提供参考。The evolution of the U.S.National Defense Strategy(NDS)report is essentially a concrete manifestation of the continuous reorientation of the U.S.strategic focus in recent years,especially against the backdrop of the ongoing shift in the global geopolitical and economic center to the Asia‒Pacific region.This shift has caused the national security focus of the U.S.to switch entirely from dealing with terrorism in the past to the great power competition of today.In fact,as an important extension of the U.S.National Security Strategy report,the NDS report has become an important tool for successive U.S.governments to maintain the country’s“Sole Superpower”status.In view of this,through a comparison of the changes in the content of the three U.S.NDS reports since the Obama administration,this report focuses on researching and analyzing the current Biden administration’s new NDS report,to provide a practical reference for the handling of Sino-U.S.relations,especially defense and military relations,in the new era.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7