检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱广新[1] Zhu Guangxin
出 处:《中州学刊》2023年第5期74-81,共8页Academic Journal of Zhongzhou
摘 要:《民法典》第499条关于悬赏广告的规定主要体现为赋予悬赏应征人一种报酬请求权。此种规范方法引发报酬请求权的理论基础是合同还是单方法律行为的争议。立足于悬赏之事的属性、悬赏作为一种特别交易方式的特色以及第499条规定本身而作实质性思考,将单方法律行为说作为悬赏应征人报酬请求权的理论基础更为可取。契约说虽然也能在理论和技术上自圆其说,但其思维方法明显有些迂回曲折。采纳单方法律行为说时,悬赏应征人报酬请求权的法律适用仅需满足三项条件,即悬赏人必须以公开方式作出悬赏意思表示、悬赏意思表示的内容必须具有确定性、悬赏应征人必须完成悬赏广告指定的特定行为。The provisions of Article 499 of the Civil Code regarding reward advertisements are mainly reflected in granting reward applicants a right to claim compensation.This normative approach gives rise to disputes as to whether a right to claim compensation is based on contract or unilateral legal act.Based on the nature of the offer of a reward,the characteristics of the offer as a special transac⁃tion method,and the provisions of Article 499 itself,it is more advisable to consider the theory of unilateral legal act as the theoretical basis for the reward applicants’compensation claim.Although the theory of contract can also be theoretically and technically justified,its thinking method is clearly somewhat convoluted.When adopting the doctrine of unilateral legal act,the legal application of the re⁃ward applicant’s right to claim compensation only needs to meet three conditions,that is,the reward applicant must express the reward intention in a public way,the contents of the reward intention must be certain,and the reward applicant must complete the specific conduct specified in the reward advertisement.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49