检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:肖新喜 Xiao Xinxi
机构地区:[1]西北政法大学经济法学院,陕西西安710063
出 处:《中州学刊》2023年第5期82-89,共8页Academic Journal of Zhongzhou
摘 要:2015年我国新修订的《食品安全法》首次明确规定了学校食品安全保障义务及行政责任,这一做法值得肯定,但美中不足的是,它没有规定学校违反该义务的民事责任。《食品安全法》需明确规定学校应对违反食品安全保障义务的行为承担侵权责任与违约责任,它们均应采取过错推定归责原则。对于学校的作为食品安全侵权的过错认定,应采取善良管理人之注意义务标准。对于学校的不作为食品安全侵权的过错认定,则应采取与处理自己事务同一的注意义务标准,学校对此种侵权损害应该与加害人一起承担不真正连带责任。The newly revised Food Safety Law of China in 2015 clearly stipulates for the first time the obligation and administrative responsibility of schools to ensure food safety.This practice is worthy of recognition,but the drawback is that it does not stipulate the civil liability of schools for violating this obligation.The Food Safety Law needs to clearly stipulate that schools should bear tort liability and breach of contract liability for violations of food safety obligations,both of which should adopt the principle of presumption of fault.For the fault determination of food safety infringement in schools,the standard of duty of care for kind-hearted managers should be a⁃dopted.For the fault determination of food safety infringement caused by school inaction,the same standard of care obligation should be adopted as handling one’s own affairs.Schools should bear joint and several liability for such infringement damages together with the perpetrators.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33