检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王佳佳 Wang Jiajia
机构地区:[1]清华大学法学院
出 处:《知识产权》2023年第3期62-76,共15页Intellectual Property
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目“平台反垄断理论问题研究”(21BFX115)阶段性成果。
摘 要:大型数字内容平台基于网络效应、用户锁定效应产生的竞争优势,叠加版权独家交易所形成的版权集中效果,极易形成现有竞争者和潜在竞争者进入市场开展经营活动的竞争瓶颈。尤其当数字内容平台本身也参与下游市场竞争时,版权滥用产生的排除、限制竞争隐忧将成为现实。目前,基于禁止滥用市场支配地位制度的规制路径存在相关市场界定争议不断、市场支配地位认定难度高、实际规制效果欠佳的局限,引入禁止版权滥用原则的私法规制路径可成为一种有益补充。在既有规制路径的具体实施中,一方面,应当尽快通过设定主体标准,要求适格的数字内容平台主体履行竞争性义务,使得具有一定版权资源积累量的数字内容平台承担以合理条件促成关键设施版权开放的义务;另一方面,设计防止版权滥用的反竞争抗辩制度也应当成为重要的补充救济手段。其中,应以违反促进数字内容产品传播、激励创新的版权法公共政策,具有反竞争效果的初步证据作为版权滥用抗辩成立的构成要件。Based on the competitive advantages generated by network effects and user lock-in effects,and superimposed with a large amount of copyrighted resources accumulated in exclusive copyright transactions,the large-scale digital content platforms can easily form a competitive bottleneck for existing competitors and potential competitors when they enter the market to carry out their business.Especially when the digital content platform itself may also participate in downstream market competition,the hidden concerns of eliminating and restricting competition caused by copyright abuse will become real.The current regulatory approach based on the abuse of dominate market system has its limitations,such as the constant disputes over the definition of relevant market,the difficulty in determining market dominance,and the poor regulatory effects in reality.The private law approach of regulation that introduces the principle of copyright abuse can be a useful supplement.In the specific implementation of the existing regulatory approach,on the one hand,it is necessary to set standards on the entities as soon as possible to require qualified digital content platforms to fulfil their obligations for competition,so that digital content platforms with a certain amount of accumulated resources are responsible to open copyright of key facilities under reasonable conditions.On the other hand,an anti-competitive defense system to prevent copyright abuse should also become an important supplementary remedy.Among others,preliminary evidence of anti-competitive effects in violation of the public policy of copyright law that promotes the dissemination of digital content products and encourages innovation should be used as a constituent element for a copyright abuse defense.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.63