检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴冠达 Wu Guanda(Institute for Education in the Arts,Hangzhou Normal University)
机构地区:[1]杭州师范大学艺术教育研究院
出 处:《文艺理论研究》2023年第2期89-97,共9页Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art
基 金:国家社会科学基金艺术学重大项目“当代欧美戏剧理论前沿问题研究”[项目编号:18ZD06]阶段性成果。
摘 要:20世纪80年代以后,身处北美的戏剧史学者在批评理论的影响下自觉地反思德国“戏剧学”在北美学界的历史遗产。北美学者使用“戏剧史编纂学”的概念来理论化戏剧史研究,并以此为基础来探索不同于实证主义的戏剧史研究方法。戏剧史编纂学关注的是戏剧史研究中根本性的假设、原则与方法。戏剧史编纂学让学界重新认识了戏剧的本质属性、戏剧史研究材料和研究对象,为欧美戏剧史研究进入“后实证主义戏剧史”的历史阶段提供了重要的理论基础。Beginning in the 1980s, under the influence of critical theories, theatre historians in North America began to critically reflect upon the historical legacy of Theaterwissenschaft(Theatre Studies). Scholars adopted the concept of “theatre historiography” to theorize research on theatre history. This intellectual move sought to explore methodologies that differ from a positivist approach to theatre history. Theatre historiography is concerned with the most essential assumptions, principles, and methodologies that determine how theatre history is produced. The emergence of theatre historiography has facilitated a renewed understanding of the essential nature of theatre, materials for research in theatre history, and research subjects. Theatre historiographers in North America have thus laid out the theoretical foundation for postpositivist theatre history within the Euro-American context.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49