检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马艳平[1] MA Yanping(Shanxi Institute of Economics and Business,Taiyuan Shanxi 030024,China)
出 处:《山西警察学院学报》2023年第3期13-20,共8页Journal of Shanxi Police College
摘 要:在建设项目压覆矿产资源案件中,法院审理时的裁判考量因素对当事人意义重大,建设单位对矿业权人的赔偿或补偿责任是核心争议,学界对此关注较少。文章采用实证方法,提炼了人民法院审理压覆资源案件时的裁判考量因素,包括建设项目权利和矿业权人权利取得的先后顺序、建设单位是否办理压覆手续对裁判结果的影响、建设单位应承担责任等,并通过比较分析方法,研究共性和差异,提出制度完善的建议。For the cases of mineral resources overlaid by construction projects,the factors considered by court are of great significance to the parties,and the compensation liability from the construction units to the mineral right holders is the core dispute,however,which have received less academic attention.Applying an empirical method,this research refined the factors considered by courts for the trials of overlaid resource cases,including the order of acquiring the rights of construction projects and the rights for mining right holders,the influence of whether the construction units go through the overlaid-resource-related procedure on the judgment,and the deserved liability for the construction units.And also by a comparative analysis method,this research studied the commonalities and differences of the cases,and put forward suggestions for system improvement.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.71