耻感文化对乡村纠纷解决机制的影响及启示  

Influences and Indications of Shame-Based Culture for Dispute Resolution Mechanism in Rural Areas

作　　者：郑朝菁 ZHENG Chaojing(Guangxi University,Nanning Guangxi 530004,China)

机构地区：[1]广西大学,广西南宁530004

出　　处：《山西警察学院学报》2023年第3期80-87,共8页Journal of Shanxi Police College

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“分解式法学范式对中国特色社会主义法治体系的影响研究”(21BFX001)。

摘　　要：耻感是一种个人内心对违反善的行为的心理评价,或是一种借助社会强制力规范个人行为的文化。在中国,耻感文化对乡村纠纷解决机制影响深远。耻感文化可能引发纠纷,影响纠纷的解决过程与解决结果。在纠纷解决中,耻感文化具有治理功能,可以提升纠纷解决的合理性,提供正确的行为指引,提升乡村的基层治理水平。应当充分发挥耻感文化的治理效能,使之在乡村纠纷解决机制中产生积极影响,在观念层面以法治精神重塑乡村伦理秩序,振兴乡村伦理共同体,减少纠纷发生;在制度层面完善乡村法治系统,高效化解纠纷。Shame is an internal psychological evaluation of an individual’s good-violation behavior,or a culture regulating individual behaviors by means of social coercion.In China,shame-based culture has a profound impact on rural dispute resolution mechanisms.The shame-based culture may trigger disputes and influence the process and outcome of dispute resolution.For dispute resolution,shame-based culture has a governance function,which can enhance the rationality of dispute resolution,provide correct behavioral guidance,and improve the grass-roots governance in rural areas.The governance effectiveness of shame-based culture should be given full play so that it can have a positive impact on the rural dispute resolution mechanism.At a conceptual level,we should reshape the rural ethical order with the spirit of rule of law,revitalize the rural ethical community,to reduce disputes;at an institutional level,we should improve the rural rule-of-law system to efficiently resolve disputes.

关 键 词：耻感文化 乡村纠纷解决 法治现代化 乡村精神文明建设 

分 类 号：D422[政治法律—政治学] D926[政治法律—国际共产主义运动]