历史意义的思想演变与当代转型——以约恩·吕森为中心  

The Transformation of Historical Meaning in Contemporary Thinking——Centered on JörnRüsen

作　　者：尉佩云 郝平[1] Wei Peiyun;Hao Ping

机构地区：[1]山西大学历史文化学院,山西太原030006

出　　处：《学术研究》2023年第4期123-130,178,共9页Academic Research

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目“民族意志视野下德国历史理论的变迁研究”(21CSS011)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：当代西方史学理论中,伴随传统历史目的论的衰落与“语言学转向”以来的叙事主义史学理论的兴起,历史意义与历史理性也逐渐丧失了系统性。历史意义与历史理性在近现代的演变过程中,历史元理性转化为认识论理性,历史意义转换为一种“事后意义”,这些概念在近现代都经历了一个从“实质性”向“范畴性”的转换。正是在这种转换中,史学职业化才得以形成。约恩·吕森作为当代德国重要的史学理论家,他在西方史学理论的总体性语境中,将现代历史经验与认识论理性相结合,以“历史文化”概念为引导,力图重新探讨历史意义和历史理性的当代合法性与思想生命力。从史学理论的未来走向上看,历史意义的“历史文化”转向是一个成功的理论转型。由此,我们能够观测到德国史学理论不同于英美史学理论的解释体系与发展趋势。In contemporary western historical theory,with the decline of traditional historical teleology and the rise of narrative historiography since the"linguistic turn",historical meaning and reason have also lost authority.The evolution of historical meaning in modern times is accompanied by historical reason.The meta-reason is decomposed into epistemological rationality,and at the same time,historical meaning becomes a process of"post-event meaning".As an important historical philosopher of contemporary Germany,JornRisen combines modern historical experience with epistemological rationality in the overall context of contemporary Western historical theory.Guided by the concept of"historical culture",Jorn Rusen tries to re-examine the historical legitimacy and the ideological vitality of historical rationality.From the perspective of the future of historical theory,the"historical culture"turn is a successful theoretical transformation.

关 键 词：历史意义 历史文化 历史理性 叙事主义 约恩·吕森 

分 类 号：K091[历史地理—历史学]