党内法规性质再访  

The Nature of Intraparty Rules and Regulations Revisited

作　　者：屠凯[1] Tu Kai

机构地区：[1]清华大学法学院,北京100084

出　　处：《党内法规研究》2023年第2期38-46,共9页Research on Intraparty Rules and Regulations

基　　金：2021年度国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国共产党依规治党的历史逻辑、理论逻辑与实践逻辑研究”(21&ZD042)。

摘　　要：关于党内法规性质的论争经历了两个阶段。在第一阶段,党内法规的“法”属性得以确立,党内法规被认为是“广义的法、独特的规”。在当前所处的第二阶段,论争的焦点则是党内法规是否具有“高级性”“实定性”“内部性”,其关键在于,要说明党内法规和国家法、实定法的具体异同。在引入第三个比较对象,即“工青妇”等三大人民团体所制定的专门规章制度后,可以为该问题的讨论提供新的论证思路和经验证据。通过比较可见,党内法规和人民团体规章更为相似,二者与国家法律明显不同,今后应更加强调党内法规的“独特性”。The debate on the nature of intraparty rules and regulations has gone through two stages.In the first stage,the legal characteristics of intraparty rules and regulations were fully recognized.Intraparty rules and regulations are now reckoned as"law in a broad sense,regulation with specialties."In the second stage,the focus of the debate is whether intraparty rules and regulations are"high-level","substantive",and"internal",and the key point is to differentiate intraparty rules and regulations from municipal law and positive law.This article is to involve a third variable in this comparison,which is the rules enacted by three people's organizations(the Communist Youth League of China,the All-China Federation of Trade Unions,and the All-China Women's Federation),and provides new analysis and evidence to theorize the phenomenon.The result is that intraparty rules and regulations are more similar to people's organizations by laws,and the municipal law is an outlier amongst the three.The specialty of intraparty rules and regulations should be emphasized in future studies.

关 键 词：党内法规 人民团体规章 高级性 实定性 内部性 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论]