检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨硕 YANG Shuo(Huajie Engineering Consulting Co.,Ltd.,Beijing 100029,China)
出 处:《中国高新科技》2023年第8期34-36,共3页
摘 要:目前多数非洲地区公路设计项目,采用的规范普遍为国际上认可度较高的法国标准及规范,而中法公路规范的差异性却对设计工作造成了一定的困扰。文章通过对中法公路路线设计规范的对比研究希望可以一定程度上帮助工程师更快地了解法国规范设计方法,同时由于篇幅所限文章仅针对道路等级与通行能力进行简要的对比研究。通过对比发现中国规范中表述得更为详细,选择范围相对明确。法国规范中更注重理论方面的研究,定性的分析较多。Currently,most road design projects in Africa adopt French standards and regulations,which are widely recognized internationally.However,the differences between the Chinese and French road standards have caused some difficulties in the design work.The article aims to help engineers understand French standard design methods more quickly through a comparative study of Chinese and French highway route design standards.Due to the limited length of the paper,only a brief comparison of road grade and traffic capacity is conducted.It is found that the Chinese route standards are more detailed in their expressions and have relatively clear selection criteria,while the French route standards focus more on theoretical research and qualitative analysis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.120