注意义务视角下短视频平台责任问题研究  被引量:3

Responsibility of Short Video Platforms from Perspective of Duty of Care

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:贾丽萍[1] 苏秀雅 JIA Liping;SU Xiuya(School of Law,Fuzhou University,Fuzhou 350108,China)

机构地区:[1]福州大学法学院,福建福州350108

出  处:《北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》2023年第2期31-38,共8页Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Sciences Edition)

基  金:国家社科基金一般项目(21BFX103)。

摘  要:构建短视频版权保护治理机制要正视和呼应现实。当前,我国短视频版权治理面临平台滥用“避风港原则”规避责任、“应知”义务与主动审查义务的界限不清晰、直接获利认定标准过于宽泛等困境。基于上述问题展开研究,深化平台注意义务正当性的法理研判,平台承担侵权控制义务应适用“善良管理人”之标准并合理衡量预防侵权成本及侵权损失。通过建构事前防范与纠错救济结合的平台责任体系、区分规范适用“应知义务”与主动审查义务、严格限缩直接获利认定范围等优化路径,规范短视频平台责任认定,促进短视频产业的有序发展。The construction of copyright protection and governance mechanism of short videos should face up to and response to realistic needs.The difficulties in copyright governance of short videos in China include the abuse of“safe harbor principle”,unclear boundary between“should know”obligation and active examination obligation and broad standard of direct profit identification.On the basis of the above-mentioned problems,it is necessary to deepen the theory of law of research on the legitimacy of duty of care of the platform.The platform should follow the standard of“good manager”and reasonably measure the cost of preventing infringement and the loss of tort when taking the responsibility of protection.Optimized path such as constructing the platform obligation system of infringement prevention and content filtering,distinguishing“should know”obligation from the active examination obligation and strictly limiting the scope of direct profit identification,can help regulate confirmation of responsibility of short video platforms and promote the orderly development of the short video industry.

关 键 词:短视频 版权侵权 注意义务 平台责任 

分 类 号:D923.[政治法律—民商法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象