检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡扬名[1] 罗隽 李涛[1] HU Yangming;LUO Jun;LI Tao(School of Public Administration and Law,Hunan Agricultural University,Changsha410128,China)
机构地区:[1]湖南农业大学公共管理与法学学院,湖南长沙410128
出 处:《现代农业》2023年第2期52-60,共9页Modern Agriculture
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目“基于供需匹配的智慧养老服务精准管理模式研究”(20AGL035)。
摘 要:运用面板三阶段DEA模型对我国28个省份2014—2019年的农村公共产品与服务的供给效率进行测度,借助ArcGIS软件进行空间可视化处理,分析各省份在空间水平方面的效率差异。结果表明:(1)我国农村公共产品与服务的综合效率值整体水平较高,但仍存在提升的空间。(2)人均GDP、财政分权、人口密度的提高会显著促进农村公共产品与服务供给效率的提升;城镇化水平的提高会制约农村公共产品与服务供给效率的优化。(3)无论是否剔除环境因素,我国农村公共产品与服务的综合效率区域排名均为东部地区>中部地区>西部地区。The panel three stage DEA model was used to measure the supply efficiency of rural public goods and services in 28 provinces of China from 2014 to 2019.Spatial visualization was conducted using ArcGIS software to analyze the efficiency differences in spatial levels among provinces.The results showed that:(1)The overall level of comprehensive efficiency of rural public goods and services in China was relatively high,but there was still room for improvement.(2)The increase in per capita GDP,fiscal decentralization,and population density significantly promoted the efficiency of rural public goods and services supply;The improvement of urbanization level restricted the optimization of the supply efficiency of rural public goods and services.(3)Regardless of whether environmental factors were excluded or not,the overall efficiency of rural public goods and services in China was in the order of eastern region>central region>western region.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171