检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:伍德志[1] WU Dezhi
机构地区:[1]武汉大学法学院
出 处:《暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)》2023年第3期54-71,共18页Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目“改革开放以来中国司法体制中‘人民群众’的历史变迁与实践影响研究”(20BFX006)。
摘 要:现代法律系统有着天然地不被信任的倾向。但现代法律系统的正常运转又依赖于信任,法律信任的建构因此只能遵循从反向出发的合法化逻辑,这要求在法律系统内部建立对于不信任的全面、严格的制度化处理机制,法律信任就变成了对于系统内部不信任功能的信任。不信任被制度化后就构成了法律信任的自我反思机制。对不信任的制度化通过将不信任情绪及其处理变成一种可预期状况与常规化操作,从而有助于实现法律信任的动态稳定。对不信任的制度化还能够使法律信任实现“去人格化”,使得人格信任所难以接受的不信任表达与处理在系统内部成为一种常态,从而极大增强了系统的内在可靠性与稳定性。ion and complexity,the modern legal system has a natural tendency to be distrusted.However,the normal operation of modern legal system depends on trust,so the construction of legal trust can only follow the legalization logic starting from the reverse,which requires the establishment of a comprehensive and strict institutional mechanism to deal with distrust in the legal system,and the legal trust becomes the trust of the function of distrust in the system.Institutionalization of distrust is the self-reflection of trust law mechanism.The institutionalization of distrust can reduce the symbolic sensitivity of legal trust,and help to realize the dynamic stability of legal trust by turning the distrust and its treatment into a predictable and routine operation.The institutionalization of distrust can also depersonalize legal trust,and make the expression and treatment of distrust,which is difficult to be accepted by personality trust,become normal in the system,thus greatly enhancing the internal reliability and stability of the system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7