网络服务平台算法推荐的著作权侵权认定规则  

Rules for Determining Copyright Infringement of Algorithm Recommendation on Network Service Platforms

作　　者：任安麒 REN Anqi(Center for Studies of Intellectual Property Rights,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan Hubei 430073,China)

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学知识产权研究中心,湖北武汉430073

出　　处：《北京航空航天大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第3期190-198,共9页Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics：Social Sciences edition Edition

基　　金：教育部高等学校学科创新引智计划项目(B18058)。

摘　　要：针对用户个性化的智能算法推荐模式已被广泛运用于各大网络服务平台,有效解决了全民创作时代的信息过载问题,但同时也引发了著作权帮助侵权认定的难题与争议。从智能推荐算法的运作机制与实践这一视角来看,由于平台具有“伪中立性”和价值取向性,因而难以通过技术中立免责,故构成著作权帮助侵权“应知”认定中的“主动推荐”。基于智能推荐算法的内容识别、筛选和推荐功能,以及平台具有的较强的信息管理能力,理应依据其服务类型、行为类型和客体类型承担一定程度的审查过滤义务,违反注意义务则将构成“应知”而承担侵权责任。The intelligent algorithm recommendation model for personalized users has been widely used in major network service platforms,which effectively solves the problem of information overload in the era of nationwide creation,but also leads to difficulties and disputes in determining copyright contributory infringement.The platforms tend to be“pseudo-neutral”and value-oriented from the perspective of their operation mechanism and their practice of intelligent algorithm recommendation,so it is difficult to be exempted from liability through technology neutrality,which constitutes“active recommendation”in the determination of“should-know”of copyright contributory infringement.Based on the functions of content identification,filtering and recommendation of the intelligent recommendation algorithm,as well as their strong information management ability,the platforms should undertake certain obligations of cencorship and filtering according to its types of service,behavior and objects;otherwise it will be liable for infringement if it violates the duty of care and constitutes“should know”.

关 键 词：著作权侵权 网络服务提供商 算法推荐 技术中立 注意义务 

分 类 号：D922.8[政治法律—法学] DF523.1