基于建阳与威尼斯的古代东西方印刷出版业形态比较  

A Comparison of Printing and Publication Formation Between East and West Based on Ancient Jianyang and Venice

作　　者：李昕 Xin LI(the School of Design&Innovation,Xiamen University Tan Kah Kee College)

机构地区：[1]厦门大学嘉庚学院设计与创意学院

出　　处：《印刷文化（中英文）》2023年第1期179-190,共12页Print Culture

基　　金：福建省中青年教师教育科研专项资助项目“设计史视角下中古时代福建内陆与威尼斯印刷业的横向比较研究”(项目编号:JAS21460)成果。

摘　　要：建阳与威尼斯都是古代世界的印刷和出版业中心,无论是从所生产书籍的种类还是影响范围来看,两地在行业的繁荣时代都可以分别代表东西方的印刷出版业。它们不同的形态特征是独立发生的,还是存在共同的背景动因?本文从宏观环境与微观表征两方面进行了比较。两地由于地理环境的相对隔绝与社会环境的相对稳定,使得印刷出版这一传播行为得以发生发展,而西方彼时的文艺复兴与东西方交流通道的再次打通又使得该行业的技术和产物得以恰逢其时的传播。在此过程中,审美标准、行业的社会地位与从业者追求的不同,都使得印刷出版业在两种文明中表现出了不同的形态,其现象的本质就是技术和文化在传播过程中所表现出的一种环境适应性。As the printing and publication centers of the ancient world,Jianyang and Venice represent this industry of the eastern and western world respectively in their booming ages.This position can be defined both by the variety of books they produced and the range of influence they achieved.This paper makes a comparison both of the factors of macro environment and micro characterization to explore whether or not the different industry formations of these two locations took place independently or resulted from a common motivation.The relative isolation of geography and the relative stabilization of society made printing and publication develope in nature.In addition,the High Renaissance was in coincidence with the reopening of the passage for east and west,such an occasion made this dissemination take place at a right time.In this process,the industry formation in the east and west was differentiated under different social ideas,aesthetic standards,and the vision of its practitioners.This differentiation was essentially a kind of environmental adaptation both culture and technology dissemination.

关 键 词：建阳 威尼斯 印刷出版 行业形态 

分 类 号：F429[经济管理—产业经济] F45[历史地理—历史学] K23[历史地理—中国史] K546.3