检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄宏宇
机构地区:[1]外交学院国际法系
出 处:《中国价格监管与反垄断》2023年第5期35-40,共6页Price Supervision and Anti-Monopoly in China
摘 要:汽车销售行业的纵向或横向垄断,国家反垄断执法机构早已严密关注。现今,该行业中的垄断协议大有向辐射型特征价格卡特尔发展的趋势,但反垄断执法过程中对其违法性认定缺乏统一标准,对未来的执法实践带来挑战,亟需有效解决。本文着重从分析汽车业纵向垄断协议所表现的中心辐射型特征及相关协议的违法性认定进行研究,进而对这类协议的违法性审查标准提出建议。The vertical monopoly agreement of the automobile sales industry has appeared in the market for longtime and has been closely watched by the anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies.Nowadays,the vertical monopoly agreements in the industry are more and more inclined to establish horizontal price cartels.The inconsistency of the criteria for determining the illegality of monopoly agreements in the process of anti-monopoly law enforcement in China will bring challenges to the future law enforcement practice.This paper focuses on the analysis of the central radiation characteristics of the vertical monopoly agreements in the automobile industry and the determination of the illegality of the relevant agreements,thus deducing that the illegality review criteria for such agreements should apply to the principle of illegality itself,and putting forward suggestions for the practice of anti-monopoly law enforcement in the automobile industry.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7