检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋雄伟 陈若凡 SONG Xiongwei;CHEN Ruofan
机构地区:[1]中共中央党校(国家行政学院)政治和法律教研部,北京100091 [2]中国社会科学院大学政府管理学院,北京102488
出 处:《北京行政学院学报》2023年第3期37-50,共14页Journal of Beijing administration institute
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目“中国特色协商民主体系与治理效能研究”(22AZD055)。
摘 要:近年来,中国协商民主研究在概念和实践层面实现了广度和深度的拓展,经历了“国外理论译介”“理论本土化”“协商民主制度化”三个重要发展阶段。从学术史的脉络来看,构建协商民主体系是中西协商民主研究需要解决的共同理论性问题。当下,中国特色协商民主体系的研究本质是以实践为导向,通过理论要素、制度要素、效能要素、话语要素四大关键议题的设置,形成中国特色协商民主的理论体系、制度体系、效能体系和话语体系,使协商民主研究的主要内容与社会层面的主要需求相匹配,从而为推动中国特色协商民主体系的构建提供分析框架和理论指引。In recent years,research on Chinese deliberative democracy has expanded in breadth and depth both conceptually and practically,and has experienced three important development stages,i.e.the stage of“translating and introducing foreign theories”,the stage of“indigenizing foreign theories”,and the stage of“institutionalizing deliberative democracy”.From the perspective of academic history,constructing the system of deliberative democracy is the common theoretical issue that research on deliberative democracy in both China and the West needs to solve.At present,the essence of research on the Chinese system of deliberative democracy is practice-oriented and is to establish a theoretical system,an institutional system,an efficiency system,and a discourse system of deliberative democracy with Chinese characteristics through the setting of four key topics(i.e.the theoretical element,the institutional element,the efficiency element,and the discourse element),which aims to match the main contents of research on deliberative democracy with the major social needs,in order to provide an analytical framework and theoretical guidance for promoting the construction of the system of deliberative democracy with Chinese characteristics.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.14.251.87