检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张辉蓉 刘燚 丁丁 ZHANG Huirong;LIU Yi;DING Ding(Faculty of Education/Basic Education Research Center/Southwest University Branch Center of National Innovation Center for Assessment of Basic Education Quality,Southwest University,Chongqing 400715,China;Institute of Mathematics and Information Science,Baoji University of Arts and Sciences,Baoji,Shaanxi 721013,China)
机构地区:[1]西南大学教育学部/基础教育研究中心/中国基础教育质量监测协同创新中心西南大学分中心,重庆400715 [2]宝鸡文理学院数学与信息科学学院,陕西宝鸡721013
出 处:《湖南师范大学教育科学学报》2023年第2期82-92,共11页Journal of Educational Science of Hunan Normal University
基 金:2021年度国家社会科学基金一般项目“新时代义务教育学校效能的统计测度与评价研究”[21BTJ021];重庆市教育科学“十四五”规划2021年度重大招标课题“重庆市教育评价改革研究”[2021-ZD-01];中国基础教育质量监测协同创新中心研究生自主课题“小学全科教师素养测评指标体系研究”[BJZK-2019A3-19103]。
摘 要:教师评价改革是新时代教育评价改革的重点任务之一。研究采用自编问卷,对国内24个省(自治区、直辖市)的8347名中小学教师就教师评价改革的进展现状进行调查,发现中小学教师评价目的能够兼顾“奖惩性”与“发展性”,教师评价主体多元,教师评价标准以“德、能、绩、勤”为核心内容,教师评价方法多样,教师评价总体效果积极,教师的教师评价观呈进步取向。但同时也面临诸多挑战:教师评价的发展性理念未能充分彰显,教师在评价中的主体性地位式微,师德师风评价有效落地遭遇困境,教师评价标准缺少分类且育人导向不明,教师评价技术“智能化”水平低,教师评价生态失衡。未来的中小学教师评价改革应强化发展性的教师评价价值导向、提高教师在评价中的主体地位、有效落实教师评价第一标准、创新教师评价的分类标准、优化教师评价的进阶方法并重构教师评价的文化生态。Teacher evaluation reform is one of the key tasks of educational evaluation reform in the new era.A self-designed questionnaire was used in this research to investigate the progress of teacher evaluation reform among 8347 primary and secondary school teachers in 24 provinces(districts,cities)in China.It is found that the purpose of teacher evaluation can give consideration to both“reward and punishment”and“development”;the subjects of teacher evaluation are diverse;the core content of teacher evaluation criteria is“morality,ability,performance and diligence”;the methods of teacher evaluation are diverse;the overall effect of teacher evaluation is positive;and teachers’view of evaluation is progressive.But at the same time,there are many challenges:the developmental concept of teacher evaluation has not been fully demonstrated;the subjectivity of teachers in the evaluation has declined;the effective implementation of teacher ethics evaluation has encountered difficulties;teacher evaluation standards are lack of classification and the education orientation is unclear;the“intelligent”level of teacher evaluation technology is low;and the ecology of teacher evaluation is unbalanced.The future reform of teacher evaluation in primary and secondary schools should strengthen the developmental value orientation of teacher evaluation;improve the dominant position of teachers in evaluation;effectively implement the first standard of teacher evaluation;innovate the classification standard of teacher evaluation;optimize the advanced methods of teacher evaluation;and reconstruct the cultural ecology of teacher evaluation.
分 类 号:G40-058.1[文化科学—教育学原理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.118.27.44