节育抑或增殖:中国人口走向的一场早期论辩  

Birth Control or Proliferation:A Debate on Demographic Trend in Early Republic of China

作　　者：吴昌祝 WU Changzhu(Institute of Modern Chinese History,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079,China)

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学中国近代史研究所,湖北武汉430079

出　　处：《安徽史学》2023年第3期76-83,共8页Historical Research In Anhui

摘　　要：新文化运动中欧风美雨流行,作为西方新知识之一的马尔萨斯人口论迅速成为大部分趋新读书人的新信仰。但国民革命发生后,孙中山阐述革命纲领“三民主义”时,却提出绝然不同的民族主义人口论,影响到一批受革命感召的知识人。两种人口论的冲突开始在新知识界出现,并在如火如荼的革命进程中直接对撞。1926年《现代评论》上的一场争议,即为显著的表现之一。论辩虽未展开所有焦点议题,却揭开了此后“过剩”“增殖”两论长久对立的序幕。此外,论辩虽围绕人口走向问题展开,背后却也潜藏有双方价值观念、“趋新”道路选择的分歧。Because of The New Culture Movement,“xichao”became popular.As one of the new Western knowledge,Malthusianism quickly became the new faith of the mainstream intelligentsia.However,in the national revolution,Sun Yat-sen put forward a nationalist population theory which is completely different from Malthusianism,when he expounded the great rallying cry for the revolution“The Three People’s Principles”.As a part of the revolution programme,Sun’s population theory was samely affecting a group of intellectuals who were inspired by the revolution.The conflict between the two theories of population inevitably appears in the intelligentsia,and directly collides in the revolutionary process.A controversy in Modern Review in 1926 was one of the Significant characterization.The controversy,which did not go into depth on all topics of the population problem,was the prelude to the long-standing controversy and politicization of academic issues that followed.

关 键 词：人口 马尔萨斯主义 民族主义 节育 增殖 

分 类 号：K262[历史地理—历史学] C924[历史地理—中国史]