对羽毛球运动中“女子打法男子化”的质疑  

Questions on“the Masculinization of Women's Play”in Badminton

作　　者：蒋湘之[1] 邓再雪 王世君[1] JIANG Xiangzhi;DENG Zaixue;WANG Shijun(Harbin Sport University,Harbin,Heilongjiang Province,150008 China;Dujiangyan Jinyan Middle School,Dujiangyan,Sichuan Province,611800 China)

机构地区：[1]哈尔滨体育学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150008 [2]都江堰市锦堰中学,四川都江堰611800

出　　处：《当代体育科技》2023年第14期11-15,共5页Contemporary Sports Technology

基　　金：黑龙江省教育科学“十四五”规划2021年度重点课题(项目名称:基于“体教融合”的高校体育教育专业羽毛球应用型人才培养模式研究,项目编号:GJB1421450);哈尔滨体育学院运动训练学梯队建设专项项目(XKB05)。

摘　　要：该文主要通过文献资料法,了解羽毛球运动中“女子打法男子化”的发展历程,对其已出现的定义、表述表示质疑。目前所说的“女子打法男子化”主要是指,女运动员进攻较为犀利、凶狠,以及在单个技术的使用上与男运动员较为相似。但是,打法类型是根据不同技战术组合而成的,基本的技战术分类没有性别之分,打法类型也没有男女之分。因此,不管女运动员的打法类型多么凶狠、单个技术的使用频率多么趋向男运动员,在说法上都不能将其打法称为“打法男子化”。在这个过程中,应尊重竞技体育的发展规律,认识到在科学的选材和训练下女运动员的整体水平在逐渐提高,不应强行将女运动员的进步与所谓的男子打法相联系。This paper mainly understands the development process of"the masculinization women's play"through the literature method,and questions its existing definition and expression.The current called"masculinization of women's play"mainly refers to that women athletes attack more sharply and fiercely,and are similar to men athletes in the use of individual technology.However,the type of play is the combination of different techniques and tactics,there is no gender difference in the basic classification of techniques and tactics,and there is no gender difference in the type of play.Therefore,no matter how fierce the type of play of female athletes and how often the use of individual technology towards male athletes,their play can't be called as"masculine play"in terms of argument.In this process,we should respect the development law of competitive sports and realize that the overall level of female athletes is gradually improving under the scientific selection and training,and we should not forcibly link the progress of female athletes with the so-called men's play.

关 键 词：羽毛球 打法类型 男子化 质疑 

分 类 号：G847[文化科学—体育训练]