《镜花缘》反讽建构遵循的逻辑理路  

The Logical Orderliness of the Irony Construction of Flowers in the Mirror

作　　者：龙彦波[1] 尚继武[2] 李传江[2] LONG Yanbo;SHANG Jiwu;LI Chuanjiang(School of Preschool Education,Lianyungang Normal College,Lianyungang 222006,China;School of Liberal Arts,Lianyungang Normal College,Lianyungang 222006,China)

机构地区：[1]连云港师范高等专科学校学前教育学院,江苏连云港222006 [2]连云港师范高等专科学校文学院,江苏连云港222006

出　　处：《连云港师范高等专科学校学报》2023年第1期1-8,共8页Journal of Lianyungang Normal College

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究项目“区域文化视域下的明清两淮盐业文学研究”(项目编号:19YJAZH038);江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究一般项目“《镜花缘》文本中的语言视觉研究”(项目编号:2019SJA2310);连云港市第六期“521人才工程”科研资助项目“《镜花缘》叙事艺术的文化意蕴”(项目编号:LRC6202176)。

摘　　要：清代小说家李汝珍以闲适愉悦、幽默风趣之笔创作了《镜花缘》,其中蕴含着类型丰富的反讽技巧。从具体运用情况看,《镜花缘》反讽建构的逻辑理路可以归纳为三条,分别是评判力度的强与弱、评价取向的正与负和意指表达的显与隐。这三种逻辑理路不是彼此孤立、相互疏离的,而是彼此勾连、相互交织的。它们涉及的两极——正与负、强与弱、显与隐——彼此之间不是绝对的,而是相对的。LI Ruzhen,a novelist in the Qing Dynasty,created Flowers in the Mirror with the style of leisure,pleasure and humor,which contains rich types of irony techniques.From the perspective of specific application,the logic orderliness of irony construction in Flowers in the Mirror can be summarized into three ways,namely,the strength and weakness of evaluation,the positive and negative of evaluation orientation,and the explicit and implicit expression of meaning.These three kinds of logic orderliness are not isolated from each other,but linked and interwoven with each other.The two poles involved in them-positive and negative,strong and weak,explicit and implicit-are not absolute but relative to each other.

关 键 词：清代小说 《镜花缘》 反讽修辞 逻辑理路 

分 类 号：I207.41[文学—中国文学]