检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:雷卓骏 黄凌云[1] 张宽 LEI Zhuojun;HUANG Lingyun;ZHANG Kuan(Chongqing University,400030;Sichuan Agricultural University,311130)
机构地区:[1]重庆大学经济与工商管理学院,400030 [2]四川农业大学经济学院,611130
出 处:《财贸经济》2023年第5期144-160,共17页Finance & Trade Economics
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“外资市场准入政策演进对中国要素收入分配格局的影响研究”(19XJL006);重庆市教委人文社科重点研究基地与中央高校基本科研业务费咨询项目“重庆科技创新资源配置效率的时空演化与优化研究”(22SKJD005);重庆市社科规划办哲学社会科学规划研究项目特别委托项目“碳关税对重庆对外贸易发展的影响研究”(2022ZDZK03)。
摘 要:缩小城乡收入差距是推进共同富裕的关键。本文利用中国城市层面的数据,借助市场准入负面清单模式试点构建双重差分模型,考察市场准入管制放松对城乡收入差距的影响及其背后的作用机制。研究发现,负面清单模式下的市场准入管制放松有助于缩小城乡收入差距,且具有显著的区域异质性,在中西部地区表现得尤为明显。经培根分解、试点非随机性、干扰政策、替换变量以及安慰剂等一系列稳健性检验后,上述结果依然成立。路径分析表明,优化城乡间资本要素配置和劳动要素配置是市场准入管制放松缩小城乡收入差距的核心机制,具体表现为农村固定资产投资和非农从业比例的显著提升。本文还证实,负面清单模式下的市场准入管制放松对城乡收入差距的缩小效应更多地起着“雪中送炭”而非“锦上添花”的作用,即负面清单模式主要缓解了城乡收入差距较大的城市的城乡收入不平等。本文的研究表明,完善市场准入基础性制度有利于优化收入分配格局,同时也为加快建设全国统一大市场提供了理论依据。The income gap between urban and rural areas accounts for more than 30%of the overall income gap in China.Thus,narrowing the urban-rural income gap is undoubtedly the key to promoting common prosperity in the country.In this context,the core issue of this paper is how the Negative List-based market access,as an important institutional arrangement for building a high-level socialist market economic system in China,will affect the urban-rural income gap.Using city-level panel data in China from 2011 to 2018,this paper constructs a DID model by utilizing the quasi-natural experiment of the Negative List pilot program to conduct empirical analysis.The main conclusion is that the relaxation of market access regulation under the Negative List model significantly narrows the urban-rural income gap,explaining 12.2%of the shrinkage during the sample period.Mechanism analysis finds that relaxing market access regulation can narrow the urban-rural income gap by optimizing the allocation of capital and labor factors between urban and rural areas.Finally,this paper also finds that the narrowing effect is more pronounced in cities with a larger urban-rural income multiple.The possible marginal contribution of this paper is twofold.First,it systematically analyzes the important role and impact mechanism of market access regulation in the change of urban-rural income gap in China,provides a new explanation for understanding the reduced income inequality from the perspective of market access.By constructing a quasi-natural experiment research framework with the policy shock of the Negative List for market access,it also minimizes the interference of endogeneity problems.Second,there are still few studies on the economic effects of the Negative List model from the perspective of the Chinese context.This paper tries to establish a connection between this major institutional innovation and China's income distribution pattern by exploring the relationship between market access and urban-rural income gap,which is a useful supplement a
分 类 号:F061.3[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.218.181.138