让与担保制度登记规则解释论  

On the Interpretation of Registration Rules of Alienation Guarantee

作　　者：林泽 LIN Ze(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学律师学院,上海200042

出　　处：《乐山师范学院学报》2023年第5期62-69,共8页Journal of Leshan Normal University

摘　　要：让与担保刻意隐藏了财产的真实权属内容,给物权公信原则提出挑战,有必要对规定模糊的公示方法深入分析。让与担保的公示方式仅限于登记一种,无论动产还是不动产,担保效果的产生均采登记生效主义。目前动产物权变动登记的范围仅限于特殊动产,不符合动产让与担保对登记的需求,对此可以从“设立人的编成主义登记簿+声明制登记”的方式解决。让与担保转移的所有权已经完全功能化为担保权,在担保关系内部可以保持所有权移转的表象,在外部行为或第三人介入时特约当即失效,外部行为的效力完全依据真实的权利义务关系进行处理。The alienation guarantee deliberately conceals the real ownership content of the property and challenges the public trust principle of real right.It is necessary to analyze the methods of public declaration.The methods of public declaration of alienation guarantee is limited to registration.Whether movable or immovable property,the effect of guarantee adopts the registration validity doctrine.At present,the registration of the change of real right of movable property is limited to special movable property,which does not meet the needs of the alienation guarantee of movable property.This problem can be solved by establishing a registration system according to individuals and applying filing system.The ownership of the transferred security has been convert into security right.The appearance of ownership transfer can be maintained within the security relationship.When the external act or the third party intervenes,the special agreement will become invalid immediately.The effectiveness of the external act is handled according to the real relationship of rights and obligations.

关 键 词：让与担保 登记制度 公信原则 

分 类 号：D923.2[政治法律—民商法学]