检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王啸 黄懿慧 吴秋荻[3] WANG Xiao;HUANG Yihui;WU Qiudi(School of Journalism and Communication,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210023,China;Department of Media and Communication,City University of Hong Kong,Hong Kong 999077,China;School of Journalism and Communication,The Chinese University of Hong Kong,Hong Kong 999077,China)
机构地区:[1]南京大学新闻传播学院,江苏南京210023 [2]香港城市大学媒体与传播系,中国香港特别行政区999077 [3]香港中文大学新闻与传播学院,中国香港特别行政区999077
出 处:《情报科学》2023年第4期105-116,共12页Information Science
基 金:江苏省社科基金青年项目“新冠肺炎疫情中‘信息疫情’的网络扩散机制与应对策略研究”(22XWC005);江苏紫金传媒智库2022年年度课题“由‘独白’转向‘对话’:健康风险下政府指导性信息发布的IDEA框架”;中国香港特别行政区大学教育资助委员会优配研究金资助项目“进退两难:食品饮水安全危机中的公众风险感知、制度信任和危机传播”(14616617)。
摘 要:【目的/意义】本研究明确区分了两类政府风险信息发布策略,即以传播者为中心的“解释”策略和以信息为中心的IDEA风险传播模型。【方法/过程】通过一项以长生生物疫苗事件为风险背景的随机实验,探索不同信息发布策略对公众关于国产疫苗的风险感知、态度和行为意向的影响。【结果/结论】研究发现,相较于“解释”策略,政府监管部门如若采用IDEA框架,能够有效降低公众对国产疫苗的风险感知,并提升其风险接受度和行为意向;两类策略的效果差异主要源自“解释”策略造成了公众对国产疫苗负面认知的加深和行为决策的趋于保守;此外,信息发布策略与人口统计特征之间并无显著的交互效应,即IDEA框架可满足来自多元文化群体的差异化信息需求。【创新/局限】为“独白”到“对话”的风险传播转向提供了可靠的实证基础,也首次在中国本土风险语境下证实了IDEA模型的有效性和跨文化可移植性,对公共健康风险下政府信息发布策略的制定和执行具有积极的指导意义。【Purpose/significance】This study explicitly distinguishes between two distinct risk communication strategies used by government regulatory authorities(i.e.,the communicator-centered"explanation"strategy and the message-centered IDEA model).【Method/process】Immediately after the Changsheng substandard vaccine incident,a post-test only quasi-experimental crosssectional survey research design was employed to examine the differential effects of regulators'instructional messages on the public's risk perceptions,risk acceptance,and behavioral intentions regarding domestic vaccines.【Result/conclusion】Results indicate that compared to the explanation-based strategy,the IDEA model is significantly more effective in reducing individuals'risk perception,increasing their risk acceptance,and sustaining their intention to consume and positively evaluate domestic vaccines.The differential effect derives mainly from the explanation-based strategy leading to a deepened negative perception of domestic vaccine associated with a more conservative behavioral intention.In addition,the interaction effect between communication strategies and demographic characteristics shows no significance that the IDEA model does not need to be tailored to meet the information needs from multicultural groups.【Innovation/limitation】The findings not only render a reliable empirical basis for upholding the shift from"monologue"to"dialogue"in risk communication,but also confirms the validity and cross-cultural generalizability of the IDEA model in the risk context of China.Practical implications for government regulators and risk communicators are also discussed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.113