检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋阳 Song Yang(School of Credit Risk Management,Law Department,Xiangtan University,Xiangtan 411105,Hunan,China)
机构地区:[1]湘潭大学法学学部信用风险管理学院,湖南湘潭411105
出 处:《征信》2023年第5期38-44,共7页Credit Reference
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目(20ZDA056);湖南省研究生科研创新项目(CX20210554)。
摘 要:行政性失信惩戒制度是社会信用法治体系建设中的重要内容,是实现社会信用体系目标和功能的关键手段。目前,行政性失信惩戒程序性法律供给不足,暴露出“一般失信行为”程序性规定缺失、失信相对人的程序性权利规定混乱及救济渠道不畅等问题。对行政性失信惩戒行为进行程序规制具有限制行政权力、保障失信相对人合法权利的价值内涵。在制度完善上,需要将“一般失信行为”纳入程序规制的范畴,赋予失信相对人知情权、行政抗辩权和获得听证权等程序性权利,拓宽失信相对人行政复议、行政诉讼的救济渠道,赋予失信相对人申请监督权等。The administrative trust-breaking disciplinary system is an important part of the construction of the social credit legal system,and is a key means to achieve the goals and functions of the social credit system.At present,the insufficient supply of procedural laws on administrative trust-breaking disciplinary exposes the lack of procedural provisions on "general trust-breaking acts",the confusion of procedural rights provisions on trust-breaking counterparts and the lack of relief channels.The procedural regulation of administrative trust-breaking disciplinary has the value connotation of limiting administrative power and protecting the legal rights of the trust-breaking counterparts.In terms of system improvement,it is necessary to bring "general trust-breaking acts" into the scope of procedural regulation,grant trust-breaking counterparts the right to be informed,the right of administrative defense,the right to obtain hearing and other procedural rights,to expand the relief channels of administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation,and grant trust-breaking counterparts the right to apply for supervision to the dishonest counterpart.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7