碳政策下损失厌恶型双采购资源企业的订购策略  

Ordering strategy for loss-averse dual sourcing enterprises under carbon emission regulations

作　　者：张瑜 张善美[2] 柏庆国[1,3] 屈彪 ZHANG Yu;ZHANG Shanmei;BAI Qingguo;QU Biao(School of Management,Qufu Normal University,Rizhao 276826,Shandong,China;Qufu Normal University Library,Rizhao 276826,Shandong,China;Institute of Operations Research,Qufu Normal University,Rizhao 276826,Shandong,China)

机构地区：[1]曲阜师范大学管理学院,山东日照276826 [2]曲阜师范大学图书馆,山东日照276826 [3]曲阜师范大学运筹学研究院,山东日照276826

出　　处：《山东大学学报（理学版）》2023年第5期101-110,共10页Journal of Shandong University(Natural Science)

基　　金：国家自然科学基金资助项目(71771138,12271309);山东省泰山学者专项基金资助项目(tsqn201812061);山东省自然科学基金资助项目(ZR2022MA038,ZR2019PA009);山东省高等学校青创创新团队项目(2019KJI006)。

摘　　要：构建了碳税和碳限额政策下损失厌恶零售商的双采购资源模型。求解需求不确定情况下零售商的最优订购决策,进而得到期望效用和碳排放。将两政策下的最优决策分别与无碳约束情形进行比较。结果表明:两种碳政策在有效管理碳排放的同时会降低零售商的期望效用;与碳税政策相比,碳限额政策在一定条件下可达到高效用利润与低碳排放的效果。对比单采购与双采购资源两种模式,得到各自效用利润与碳排放量的优势范围。最后,通过数值实验分别描述碳税、碳配额和零售商损失厌恶系数对最优决策的影响。A dual sourcing model of a loss-averse retailer under carbon tax and mandatory carbon emission capacity regulations is proposed.The optimal ordering decision of the retailer under the condition of uncertain demand is solved,and the expected utility and carbon emissions are obtained.Under the optimal results for the case of without carbon constraint,both regulations reduce the expected utility of retailers while effectively managing carbon emissions.Mandatory carbon emissions capacity regulation exhibits higher utility and lower carbon emission under some circumstances.By comparing the two models of single sourcing and dual sourcing of resources,the advantageous range of their respective utility profits and carbon emissions are obtained.Finally,the effects of carbon tax,carbon quota and retailers loss aversions coefficient on optimal decisions are determined through numerical experiments.

关 键 词：碳税 碳配额 损失厌恶 双采购资源 

分 类 号：F253[经济管理—国民经济] O227[理学—运筹学与控制论]