图书馆特殊群体包容性的法制化研究--以中、俄、法、韩、美、日、英为例  

Research on the Legalization of the Inclusion of Special Groups in Libraries:Taking China,Russia,France,South Korea,the United States,Japan and the United Kingdom as Examples

作　　者：王俊芬[1] 龚蛟腾[1] Wang Junfen;Gong Jiaoteng(Xiangtan University Library,Xiangtan 411105)

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学图书馆,湘潭411105

出　　处：《图书情报工作》2023年第10期56-62,共7页Library and Information Service

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目“中国图书馆学学科建设与创新研究”(项目编号:20ATQ001)研究成果之一。

摘　　要：[目的/意义]从法制化角度探讨图书馆特殊群体包容性问题,为建立健全图书馆特殊群体包容制度提供参考借鉴。[方法/过程]基于质性文本研究方法,构建以特殊群体类型与包容性内涵维度为轴的分析框架,以中、俄、法、韩、美、日、英等国的10份图书馆法律文本为研究对象展开分析。[结果/结论]分析发现我国图书馆存在特殊群体类型的法制重视程度差异较大、包容内涵维度的法律条文规定较为疏略、特殊群体包容的法制建设格局有待健全等问题,提出平等重视各类特殊群体的包容权利、加强特殊群体包容维度的协调覆盖、完善特殊群体包容服务的配套制度等建议。[Purpose/Significance] This paper discusses the inclusion of special groups in libraries from the perspective of legalization,so as to provide reference for establishing and improving the inclusion system of special groups in libraries.[Method/Process]Based on the qualitative text research method,an analysis framework was constructed with the special group type and inclusive connotation dimension as the axis,and 10 library legal texts from China,Russia,France,South Korea,the United States,Japan,and the United Kingdom were analyzed as the research objects.[Result/Conclusion]The analysis finds that there are many problems in China's libraries,such as great differences in the importance of rule of law among special groups,relatively sparse provisions on inclusive connotation,and the pattern of rule of law construction for inclusion of special groups to be improved.Suggestions are put forward,such as paying equal attention to the inclusive rights of various special groups,strengthening the coordinated coverage of the inclusive dimension of special groups,and improving the supporting system of inclusiveservicesfor special groups.

关 键 词：图书馆 特殊群体 包容性 法制化 

分 类 号：G252[文化科学—图书馆学]