数字平台滥用市场支配地位行为的创新损害分析——基于国内外典型案例的比较研究  

Innovation Damage Analysis of Digital Platform Abuse of Market Dominance:Comparative Study Based on Typical Cases at Home and Abroad

作　　者：方翔 Fang Xiang

机构地区：[1]苏州大学王健法学院

出　　处：《苏州大学学报（法学版）》2023年第2期49-60,共12页Journal of Soochow University：Law Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目“强化反垄断促进平台经济健康发展研究”(项目编号:21AZD017)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：数字经济的高质量发展以创新为驱动力。为谋求市场地位的稳固,大型数字平台企业更有能力和动机阻碍其他竞争者的创新威胁。反垄断法要确保数字市场中的创新不受阻滞,须构建有效的创新损害理论,并将其纳入滥用市场支配地位行为的分析框架。我国反垄断执法机构在阿里巴巴和美团“二选一”垄断案中首次尝试引入创新损害分析,但相关论证缺乏坚实的理论基础,呈现出模糊性与不确定性。比较和借鉴国外相关执法案例的成熟经验,我国反垄断法可将滥用行为的创新损害类型化为“排他性创新损害理论”和“非排他性创新损害理论”的二分构造。对于数字平台基于促进创新的抗辩主张,应结合个案情况采取“实质性创新”标准,通过判断所涉“创新”行为是否会导致市场的长期竞争和消费者利益受损,以审查抗辩事由成立与否。The high-quality development of digital economy is driven by innovation.In order to secure the market position,large digital platform enterprises have the ability and motivation to hinder the innovation threats of other competitors.In order to ensure that innovation in digital market is not impeded,anti-monopoly law must construct an effective innovation damage theory,and bring it into the analysis framework of abuse of market dominance.China’s anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies tried to introduce innovation damage analysis for the first time in the“alternative one”monopoly case of Alibaba and Meituan,but the related arguments lacked a solid theoretical basis,showing fuzziness and uncertainty.Comparing with the mature experience of foreign law enforcement cases,China’s anti-monopoly law can classify the innovation damage of abuse into a binary structure of“exclusive innovation damage theory”and“non-exclusive innovation damage theory”.For the defense claim of digital platform based on promoting innovation,the standard of“substantial innovation”should be adopted in combination with individual cases,and whether the“innovation”behavior involved will lead to long-term competition in the market and damage to consumers’interests can be judged to check whether the defense reason is established or not.

关 键 词：数字平台 滥用市场支配地位 创新损害理论 实质性创新标准 

分 类 号：D922.294[政治法律—经济法学]