检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曾凡宇 张锋 程衍 ZENG Fan-yu;ZHANG Feng;CHENG Yan(School of Law,Zhejiang Wanli University,Ningbo Zhejiang 315100,China;School of Political Science and Law,Hubei University of Arts and Science,Xiangyang Hubei 441053,China;Institution of Social Science,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201620,China)
机构地区:[1]浙江万里学院法学院,浙江宁波315100 [2]湖北文理学院政法学院,湖北襄阳441053 [3]华东政法大学科学研究院,上海201620
出 处:《北京交通大学学报(社会科学版)》2023年第2期125-132,共8页Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:2021年度浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题“美国反垄断制度下浙江企业对美出口法律风险防控研究”(21NDQN274YB)的阶段性成果;浙江万里学院科研发展基金项目。
摘 要:根据2022年新修订的《反垄断法》,违反《反垄断法》且构成犯罪的行为人将被追究刑事责任,这对我国反垄断刑事责任制度的构建具有重要意义。构建以垄断行为有限入罪为核心的反垄断刑事责任制度存在必要性与合理性。甄别各类垄断行为社会危害性的差异后可见,垄断行为有限入罪的适用范围应当包括横向垄断协议和滥用市场支配地位。在垄断犯罪的犯罪构成要件中,犯罪客体是社会主义市场经济秩序中的公平竞争关系;危害结果包括重大经济损害和反垄断损害;犯罪主体包括自然人和单位;犯罪主观方面是行为人明知所实施的垄断行为具有排斥市场公平竞争、损害消费者福利等危害结果,并希望这种危害结果发生的直接故意。在立法模式上,应采用法典模式,以契合我国的立法传统并实现反垄断刑事处罚与反垄断行政处罚的合理衔接。According to the newly revised Anti-Monopoly Law in 2022,those who violate the provisions of the Anti-Monopoly Law and constitute a crime will be investigated for criminal responsibility,which is of great significance to the construction of China’s anti-monopoly criminal liability system.It is necessary and rational for China to establish a criminal anti-monopoly liability system based on limited punishment against monopolistic conduct.In view of the differences in the harmfulness of various monopolistic behaviors,the scope of application of limited criminalization of monopolistic conducts should include horizontal monopoly agreements and abuse of market dominance.Among the criminal constituent elements of monopoly crime,the criminal object is the fair competition in the socialist market economic order;the harmful consequences of monopoly crime include significant economic damage and anti-monopoly injury;the criminal subject includes natural persons and units;the subjective aspect of monopoly crime is direct intent that the perpetrators know monopolistic conducts they engaged will inevitably cause harmful consequences such as the exclusion of market competition and damage to consumer welfare,and yet they hope for the occurrence of such consequences.As to the legislative mode,it is suggested that China should adopt the code model that conforms to our legislative tradition,and realize the reasonable connection between anti-monopoly criminal punishment and anti-monopoly administrative punishment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49