检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王惟信 WANG Weixin(Law School,Guangdong University of Foreign Studies,Guangzhou 51000,China)
机构地区:[1]广东外语外贸大学法学院,广东广州510000
出 处:《洛阳理工学院学报(社会科学版)》2023年第3期92-96,共5页Journal of Luoyang Institute of Science and Technology:Social Science Edition
摘 要:学界关于隐私权和个人信息权益的权利属性及法律适用之界分一直伴有争议,主要存在三种主流观点,分别是包含说、并列说、交叉说。交叉说认为隐私权和个人信息权益之间要么前者包含后者或者后者包含前者;而并列说则认为两者是两类性质不同的人格权,并支持国家对个人信息权益进行单独立法。交叉说认为隐私权与个人信息权益之间存在私密信息内容之间的交叉重叠。基于隐私权和个人信息权益之间权利属性、保护客体、救济方式以及立法价值等多为角度考查,隐私权与个人信息权益的交叉重叠性更为合理地揭示了两者之间关系。There have been controversies in the academic community regarding the attributes and legal application of the privacy right and the personal information right,and there are three main views,namely,inclusion,juxtaposition and intersection.The inclusive view believes that either the right to privacy encompasses the right to personal information or the latter encompasses the former,while the juxtaposition view holds that the two belong to different types of personal rights,and support separate national legislation on personal information.The intersectional view justify an overlap between the two rights in terms of the content of private information,which is more reasonable,based on the attributes of the right,the object of protection,the remedies and the value of the legislation,etc.The overlap between the right to privacy and the right to personal information reveals the a more rational relationship with each other.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222