刑民交叉视野下合同诈骗罪裁判路径探究——以179份无罪判决为样本  

Research on the Judgment Path of Contract Fraud Crime from the Perspective of Cross between Crimeand Civil Affairs——Based on 179 acquittals as samples

作　　者：陈思思 侯文静 Chen Sisi;Hou Wenjing(Guangze County People's Court,Fujian 353000,China;Shanghai No.1 Intermediate People's Court,Shanghai 200336,China)

机构地区：[1]福建省光泽县人民法院,福建354100 [2]上海市第一中级人民法院,上海200336

出　　处：《天津法学》2023年第1期23-32,共10页Tianjin Legal Science

基　　金：最高人民法院2020-2021年度司法改革专项调研课题《法律适用分歧解决机制下中级法院职能定位研究》(SPCJR2020002)阶段性成果之一。

摘　　要：通过对179份合同诈骗罪无罪判决书的合同类型、合同事由、签订合同主观动机、判决认定为无罪的理由以及无罪事由中无法推定非法占有目的的具体原因等特征进行实证研究,总结出刑民交叉案件裁判过程中存在的疑难问题。从实体上提炼出区分民事欺诈与刑事诈骗的关键要素,从行为人实际履行合同的能力、履行合同的行为、获得财物后处置方式、合同不能履行后行为人的态度四个方面剖析非法占有目的的判断维度,再从犯罪金额的认定方面进行阐述,提出公共秩序下刑民交叉合同诈骗罪案件的司法认定路径。According empirical study on type of contract,cause of contract,subjective motivation for signing a contract,grounds for acquittal and specific reasons for inextricable purpose of unlawful possession based on a sample of 179 acquittals,we summarize the difficult problems of criminal and civil cross case judgment.And then,we summarize key elements to distinguish civil fraud and criminal fraud.There are four views to analyse inextricable purpose of unlawful possession:the ability of performing a contract,the act of performing a contract,handling way of property,and the attitude after the contract cannot be performed.Finally,we come up with the judgment path of contract fraud crime from the perspective of cross between crime and civil affairs under public order after expounding Amount of crime.

关 键 词：刑民交叉 民事欺诈 非法占有目的 合同诈骗罪 

分 类 号：D913.6[政治法律—民商法学]