检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗业辉[1] 柯林杰 李子洋 LUO Yehui;KE Linjie;LI Ziyang(CCCC Water Transportation Consultants Co.,Ltd.,Beijing 100007,China)
机构地区:[1]中交水运规划设计院有限公司,北京100007
出 处:《水运工程》2023年第6期131-136,153,共7页Port & Waterway Engineering
摘 要:针对新江海河航道双桥枢纽与新江海枢纽距离近、水位差小且上下游平水期长,对双桥梯级方案取消与否两种方案进行技术经济分析。结果表明,取消双桥梯级方案对区域防洪、排涝、水系连通、水质等影响较大,水系恢复工程总投资和营运费用高,项目内部收益率低;保留双桥梯级方案维持现有水系布局,船闸具备开通条件,可与新江海河船闸联合调度,共用待闸锚地,经济上合理。In view of the close distance between Shuangqiao junction and Xinjianghai junction in the Xinjianghai River waterway,the small water level difference,and the long normal level period in the upstream and downstream,this paper carries out the technical and economic analysis of retaining or canceling the Shuangqiao cascade scheme.The results show that canceling the Shuangqiao cascade scheme has a great influence on regional flood control,drainage,water system connectivity,and water quality.The total investment and the operation cost of the water system restoration project are high,and the internal rate of return of the project is low.In contrast,retaining the Shuangqiao cascade scheme to maintain the existing water system layout can ensure that the ship lock can be opened and jointly dispatched with the ship lock of the Xinjianghai River,so as to share the anchorage to be locked,which is economically reasonable.
分 类 号:U641[交通运输工程—船舶及航道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.134.253.192