从“多点采风”到“田野调查”:民族舞蹈学研究范式的转变(下)  

From"Multi-point Sampling"to"Fieldwork":the Change of Research Paradigm of Dance Ethnology

作　　者：苏蓉 SU Rong(Yunnan Minzu University,Kunming,Yunnan 650500)

机构地区：[1]云南民族大学,云南昆明650000

出　　处：《怀化学院学报》2023年第2期23-32,共10页Journal of Huaihua University

基　　金：国家社会科学基金艺术学项目“民族舞蹈学研究”(18BE078);云南省哲学社会科学艺术科学规划项目“文化复合性视域下中老舞蹈文化交流研究”(A2022YW08)。

摘　　要：21世纪初,受“田野调查”一词的启发,国内舞蹈界出现了“民族舞蹈学”“舞蹈人类学”以及“舞蹈田野调查”这类学术用语,经过十多年的学术实践,相关概念及有关研究范式在国内舞蹈学界逐步确立。基于“民族舞蹈学”的研究范式,从舞蹈田野调查的前期准备、中期实施以及后期的整理等三个方面切入,指出舞蹈调查报告与舞蹈民族志的差异,并指出“舞蹈民族志”是对调查报告做出的进一步文化阐释与分析,与前者相比,后者更注重研究者从“主位”和“客位”的双重视角进行文化意义的阐释,更有利于呈现地方性知识和理论的构建。文章亦为“民族舞蹈学”研究范式的建立提供理论参考。In the early 21st century,inspired by the word"fieldwork",academic terms such as"Dance Ethnology","Dance Anthropology"and"Dance Fieldwork"appeared in domestic dance circles.After more than ten years of academic practice,relevant concepts and research paradigms have been gradually established in domestic dance circles.Based on the analysis of the research paradigm of"Dance Ethnology",this paper points out the differences between the dance investigation report and the dance ethnography from three aspects:the preliminary preparation,the middle implementation and the later arrangement of the dance field investigation.This paper points out that dance ethnography is a further cultural interpretation and analysis of the investigation report.Compared with the former,the latter pays more attention to the interpretation of cultural significance from the dual perspectives of"emic"and"etic",which is more conducive to the construction of local knowledge and theories.This paper also provides theoretical reference for the establishment of the research paradigm of Dance Ethnology.

关 键 词：多点采风 田野调查 民族舞蹈学 舞蹈民族志 

分 类 号：C95[社会学—民族学]