德国行政程序中的结构性原则  

The Structural Principles in Germany's Administrative Proceedings

作　　者： 李剑(译) Martin Beckmann

机构地区：[1]德国明斯特大学 [2]德国律师协会环境法委员会 [3]中南林业科技大学政法学院

出　　处：《法治现代化研究》2023年第3期191-200,共10页Law and Modernization

基　　金：湖南省社科基金年度项目“湖南省个人碳信用形成机制法治保障研究”(22YBA110)的资助。

摘　　要：个人权利的法律救济仍然是行政程序结构中的核心原则,但德国联邦行政法院的各种规定已经将行政程序扩展到个人法律救济之外,朝着对客观法律进行审查的方向发展。特别是在环境法领域,对《行政程序法》第46条的限制性解释使得这一趋势越发明显。欧盟法赋予环境协会主观权利地位被认为符合公共利益。这一规定也使得《联邦污染物排放保护法》第47条所追求的健康保护之目的超出对自然人的保护范围。由此而引起的关于司法审查密度的问题也成为理论关注的焦点。Legal remedies for individual rights remain a core principle in the structure of administrative proceedings,but various provisions of the German Federal Administrative Court have extended administrative procedures beyond individual legal remedies towards a review of objective law.In the area of environmental law in particular,this trend is exacerbated by the restrictive interpretation of Article 46 of the Code of Administrative Procedure.It is considered in the public interest to give environmental associations subjective rights under EU law.This provision also makes the purpose of health protection pursued by Section 47 of the Federal Pollutant Discharge Protection Act beyond the protection of natural persons.The resulting question of the density of judicial review has also become the focus of theoretical attention.

关 键 词：基本权 程序结构 司法审查 审查密度 

分 类 号：D951.6[政治法律—法学]