不同内植物修复单侧不稳定骨盆后环损伤的有限元及生物力学分析  

Finite element and biomechanical analysis of different implants in repair for unilateral unstable pelvic posterior ring injury

作　　者：梁成 张麟麒 王冠 李文 段可 李忠 鲁晓波 卓乃强 Liang Cheng;Zhang Linqi;Wang Guan;Li Wen;Duan Ke;Li Zhong;Lu Xiaobo;Zhuo Naiqiang(Department of Orthopedics,Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University,Luzhou 646000,Sichuan Province,China;Sichuan Provincial Laboratory of Orthopedic Implanted Device R&D and Application Technology Engineering,Luzhou 646000,Sichuan Province,China;Clinical Medicine Research Center,Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University,Luzhou 646000,Sichuan Province,China;Department of Joint Surgery,Sichuan Mianyang 404 Hospital,Mianyang 621000,Sichuan Province,China)

机构地区：[1]西南医科大学附属医院骨科,四川省泸州市646000 [2]四川省骨科置入器械研发及应用技术工程实验室,四川省泸州市646000 [3]西南医科大学附属医院临床医学研究中心,四川省泸州市646000 [4]四川绵阳四〇四医院关节外科,四川省绵阳市621000

出　　处：《中国组织工程研究》2024年第9期1336-1341,共6页Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research

基　　金：泸州-西南医科大合作项目(2020LZXNYDF02),项目负责人:王冠;泸县-西南医科大合作项目(2020LXXNYKD-01),项目负责人:鲁晓波。

摘　　要：背景:骨盆稳定性主要由骨盆后环决定及骶髂关节决定,车祸等高能量冲击带来的骨盆后环损伤及骶髂关节脱位病例逐年递增。手术治疗是最优方法,临床中存在多种内植物修复方式,但哪种治疗方式的生物力学性能最优仍有一定争议。目的:对比前路双钢板、后路桥接钢板、拉力钉3种内植物修复单侧不稳定骨盆后环损伤的生物力学性能,为其临床治疗及骨盆新型拉力钉研发提供参考。方法:①有限元仿真:利用Mimics、Wrap和SolidWorks分别建立正常骨盆、单侧后环损伤骨盆及其前路双钢板、后路桥接钢板、拉力钉修复模型,利用Ansys分析模型的应力和变形情况;②生物力学实验:用15个完整骨盆标本随机分为5组,分别为正常骨盆、单侧后环损伤骨盆及其前路双钢板、后路桥接钢板、拉力钉修复组,并用Instron E10000力学试验机进行力学测试。结果与结论:①仿真分析结果显示,正常骨盆模型骶骨平均位移为0.174 mm,骶髂骨最大应力为10.51 MPa,应力分布均匀;单侧不稳定损伤骨盆模型骶骨平均位移最大,为0.267 mm,模型应力集中明显;3种修复模型骶骨平均位移都接近正常骨盆模型,拉力钉修复模型骶髂骨应力分布均匀;②力学实验结果显示,正常骨盆模型整体刚度为(226.38±4.18)N/mm,单侧不稳定损伤骨盆模型整体刚度最小为(130.02±2.19)N/mm,3种修复方式整体刚度和正常骨盆偏差都在±10%以内,修复效果明显;③仿真结果和力学实验结果相符;④从生物力学角度分析,拉力钉修复模型的生物力学状态与正常骨盆最接近,该种方式最佳;前路双钢板修复刚度过大,应力遮挡效果更显著;后路桥接钢板修复不能解决正常侧软组织的代偿效果,存在缺陷;该研究可为临床手术提供优选依据;⑤骨盆新型拉力钉应从拉力钉的角度进行改良,保留拉力钉良好的生物力学性能,同时附加其他优势性能,例如可用�BACKGROUND:The stability of the pelvis is mainly determined by the posterior pelvic ring and the sacroiliac joint.The posterior pelvic ring injury and the dislocation of the sacroiliac joint caused by high energy impacts such as car accidents increase year by year.Surgical treatment is the best method,and there are many kinds of endophytorepair methods in clinical practice,but which treatment method has the best biomechanical properties is still controversial.OBJECTIVE:To compare the biomechanical properties of three kinds of internal implants:anterior double plates,posterior bridging plate and tension nail in the repair of unilateral unstable pelvic posterior ring injury,to provide a reference for the clinical treatment and development of a new pelvic tension screw.METHODS:(1)Finite element simulation:Mimics,Wrap and SolidWorks were used to establish normal pelvic model,unilateral injured pelvis model,and three kinds of internal implant repaired models(anterior double plates,posterior bridging plate and tension nail).Ansys was used to analyze the stress and deformation of the models.(2)Biomechanical test:A total of 15 intact pelvic specimens were randomly grouped into five groups,normal pelvic model,unilateral injured pelvis model,anterior double plates,posterior bridging plate and tension nail groups.The mechanical test was performed using an Instron E10000 testing machine.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:(1)Simulation:In the normal pelvic model,the average displacement of the sacrum was 0.174 mm,and the maximum stress of the sacral iliac bone was 10.51 MPa,and the stress distribution was uniform.The mean sacral displacement of the unilateral injured pelvis model was 0.267 mm,and the stress concentration of the model was obvious.The mean displacement of the sacrum in the three repaired models was close to that in the normal pelvic model,and the stress distribution of the sacral iliac bone in the tension nail repaired model was uniform.(2)Mechanical test:The stiffness of the normal pelvic model was(226.38±4.18)N/mm,and t

关 键 词：不稳定骨盆后环损伤 内植物 拉力钉 有限元分析 生物力学 

分 类 号：R459.9[医药卫生—治疗学] R318[医药卫生—临床医学] R684