How Could Chinese Thinking Modes Integrate into Contemporary Western Epistemology?——A Hybrid Perspective of Both AI and the Confucian Theory of the Rectification of Names  

作　　者：XU Yingjin 

机构地区：[1]School of Philosophy,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433,China

出　　处：《Frontiers of Philosophy in China-Selected Publications from Chinese Universities》2022年第2期212-243,共32页中国高等学校学术文摘·哲学（英文版）

基　　金：This paper is the phased result of the project"Natural Language Understanding and Research in the New Generation of Artificial Intelligence"(19JZD010);a Major Project on Philosophy and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China.

摘　　要：Post-Gettier contemporary epistemology is different from traditional epistemology in the sense that the former is concerned more with the normative dimension of knowledge,while the latter is concerned more with how knowledge is actually formed.Due to the cultural differences concerning how to understand key epistemological terms like"knowledge","belief,"and"justification,"the Chinese-speaking philosophical world,analytic thinkers precluded,has long been unable to appreciate the fruits of the post-Gettier epistemology.Two intermediate moves are proposed to take for flling the gap between post-Gettier epistemology and the Chinesespeaking intellectual community:Firstly,the fusion of AI and epistemology is encouraged,hence,such a move would provide a chance to double-check the putative universal applicability of specific conclusions of the post-Gettier epistemology from an engineering perspective;secondly,an algorithmoriented reconstruction of the Confucian theory of the rectification of names is also encouraged to bring new life to some traditional Chinese-based thoughts on the process of epistemic justification.

关 键 词：EPISTEMOLOGY knowledge AI rectification of names JUSTIFICATION 

分 类 号：B08[哲学宗教—哲学理论]