检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐英瑾[1] Xu Yingjin(Fudan University)
机构地区:[1]复旦大学哲学学院,上海200433
出 处:《武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2023年第4期70-79,共10页Wuhan University Journal:Philosophy & Social Science
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(22BZX031)。
摘 要:20世纪上半叶,汉语哲学界发生了三件大事:一是作为罗素访华事件的副产品,分析哲学的方法与数理逻辑的工具开始传入中国学术界;二是以金岳霖、冯友兰、张岱年为代表的中国哲学家在汇通中西哲学资源的基础上,开始建立汉语自身的新哲学体系;三是唯物辩证法开始传入中国。三股思潮剧烈碰撞,最终使得两个逻辑哲学问题成为当时学界的重要话题:一是数理逻辑能否成为各文明体哲学构建的基础框架?二是数理逻辑究竟是辩证法需要克服的对象,还是与之并行不悖,或者是形而上学构架的逻辑基础?与今日中国哲学界的风气不同,当时中国一流的哲学家特别是金岳霖与张岱年,在面对张东荪提出的“逻辑多元论”时,都愿意为数理逻辑的基础地位提出全面辩护,并且认为数理逻辑的使用既不影响哲学构建的民族特色,也不影响辩证法继续在方法论上起效。Three big events occurred in the Chinese-speaking philosophical circle in the first half of 20th century:Firstly,as a by-product of Bertrand Russell's visit of China in 1920-1921,mathematical logic and the general methodology of analytic philosophy started to circulate in the Chinese academic circle;secondly,leading Chinese philosophers represented by Jin Yuelin,Feng Youlan and Zang Dainian,by integrating domestic and western philosophical resources,began to establish their own philosophical systems;thirdly,dialectics was also introduced into China with the spread of Marxism.The complicated interplays among the preceding three factors prompted Chinese philosophers at that time to reflex upon the following two questions concerning the nature of logic.One was whether mathematical logic could be the fundamental framework for accommodating varieties of philosophical constructions in accordance with the features of different civilizations.The other was whether mathematical logic was something that should be replaced by dialectical logic,or something that it could co-exist with,or the logical foundation for any metaphysical framework.In response to Zhang Dongsun's"logical pluralism",top Chinese philosophers like Jin Yuelin and Zhang Dainian still attempted to defend the fundamental status of mathematical logic,which would neither jeopardize the national characteristics of any philosophy nor undermine the efficacy of dialectics as a useful methodology.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.116