检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张代伟[1] Zhang Daiwei(Jilin Police College,Changchun Jilin 130117)
机构地区:[1]吉林警察学院,吉林长春130117
出 处:《警学研究》2023年第2期97-103,共7页Police Science Research
摘 要:自由裁量权是现代行政的必然产物,是公安机关行政执法权的重要组成部分。治安管理处罚中的自由裁量权是公安机关依照《治安管理处罚法》行使行政自由裁量权中最为广泛的一项权力,在执法实践中容易被执法者所滥用,会对行政相对人的合法权益造成损害,严重影响了法律的公正性、严肃性及社会的稳定。以治安管理处罚中的自由裁量权的概念及特征入手,剖析治安管理处罚中的自由裁量权的必要性以及滥用的原因,并提出控制自由裁量权的合理对策。只有对治安管理处罚中自由裁量权加以控制,才能保障人民群众的合法权益。Discretion is the product of modern administration and an important part of the administrative law enforcement rights of public security organs.The discretion in public security management punishment is the most extensive power exercised by public security organs in accordance with the Public Security Management Punishment Law.This right is easy to be abused by law enforcers in law enforcement practice,which damages the legitimate rights and interests of administrative counterparts,and seriously affects the fairness,seriousness of the law and social stability.Through the concept and characteristics of discretion in public security management punishment,this paper analyzes its necessity and the reasons for abuse,and puts forward reasonable countermeasures to control discretion.The control of discretion in public security management punishment can protect the legitimate rights and interests of the people.
分 类 号:D922.14[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222