我国司法鉴定收费的反思与完善——基于F省的观察  

Reflection and Improvement of the Charge of Judicial Identification in China from the Perspective of F Province

作　　者：朱昕昱 ZHU Xin-yu

机构地区：[1]南京理工大学知识产权学院

出　　处：《科学决策》2023年第5期224-234,共11页Scientific Decision Making

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(项目编号:17BFX052)。

摘　　要：实践中,因司法鉴定费用过高引发的妨碍当事人选择鉴定、判决偏离客观真实等负面效应日益显现。尽管各地采用多种方式降低鉴定费用,但因未改变商业化主导的司法鉴定收费体制,致使改革效果未达预期。事实上,司法鉴定的公法属性决定了司法鉴定收费制度应当坚持公益性原则,我国司法鉴定收费制度亦需围绕公益性原则予以重新定位。相应地,我国司法鉴定收费应当采取“成本收费+法院监管”模式,如此才能减轻当事人的诉讼成本负担,消解司法鉴定的适用障碍,使司法鉴定更好地发挥其司法辅助功能。In practice,because of the high cost of judicial identification,the negative effects such as hindering the parties to choose judicial identification and the judgment deviating from the objective reality are increasingly apparent.Although various measures have been adopted to reduce the cost of judicial identification,the effect of the reform is not satisfied because the commercial oriented charging system of judicial identification has not been changed.In fact,the public law character of judicial identification determines that the charging system of judicial identification should insist on the principle of public welfare.There is no doubt that the charging system of judicial identification in China also needs to be reoriented around the principle of public welfare.Therefore,the mode of “cost charge plus court supervision” should be adopted in the charge of judicial identification.Only in this way can the litigation cost burden of the parties be reduced,the obstacles to the application of judicial identification be eliminated,and judicial identification can better play its judicial auxiliary function.

关 键 词：司法鉴定 鉴定费用 公法行为 公益性 

分 类 号：D926.1[政治法律—法学]