论国际刑事法院的理想设计与现实本位  

International Criminal Court:An Ideal Design vs.A Realistic Role

作　　者：潘俊武 Pan Junwu

机构地区：[1]西北政法大学,陕西西安710063

出　　处：《江西社会科学》2023年第4期32-41,206,共11页Jiangxi Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“《联合国海洋法公约》中强制调解程序与中国应对措施研究”(17BFX139)。

摘　　要：对国际刑事法院的认识有两个角度,一个是从理想的角度,另一个是从现实的角度。近期,一些《国际刑事法院规约》缔约国退出条约和美国对国际刑事法院检察官的制裁,引发人们从现实角度对国际刑事法院进行一些反思。事实上,国际刑事法院是在世界联邦主义运动影响下产生的,是理想的产物,与现实世界存在着种种冲突。其中根本性冲突是,它存在的根基是按照国内一元法律体系而设计的,而现实的国际环境是二元法律体系。因此,有必要将其回归本位,理性认识其有限作用,任何过度夸大其作用的做法都会危及其未来的命运。There are two perspectives on the International Criminal Court(the ICC),one from an ideal perspective and the other from a realistic perspective.In the past few years,the incidents that some State Parties to the ICC Statute withdrew from the treaty and the United States imposed sanctions on the ICC prosecutors have triggered a reflection on the ICC's role from a realistic perspective.In fact,the ICC,as a product of idealism,came into being under the influence of the world federalist movement,in no way escaping its contradiction with the real world.The contradiction roots in the fact that it was designed at the very beginning in accordance with the domestic unitary legal system while it lives in the world with both the domestic legal system and the international legal system in co-existence.Therefore,it is necessary for the ICC to return to its site and play a limited role as a rational choice.Any over-exaggeration of its role will endanger its future.

关 键 词：国际刑事法院 世界法 国际罪行 

分 类 号：D997.9[政治法律—刑法学]