论人民陪审员制度“分职分权”的改革与完善  

On the Reform and Improvement of the“Separation of Positions and Powers”of the People’s Juror System

作　　者：冯瑸瑜 FENG Binyu(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201600,China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学,上海201600

出　　处：《宁波开放大学学报》2023年第2期100-105,共6页Journal of Ningbo Open University

摘　　要：我国人民陪审员制度是公众参与司法的基本制度,其主要职能是促进司法民主和司法公正。近年来,我国通过出台一系列的法律规定对七人合议庭中的人民陪审员职能作出重大的改变,将人民陪审员的职能主要限定在事实认定层面。改革的目的是为了改变陪审员“陪而不审、审而不议”“驻庭法官”“编外法官”的现象,目前而言已颇有成效。在人民陪审员制度基本框架确立的前提下,可以通过借鉴域外陪审团的先进经验,完善相应的配套制度弥补司法实践中残留的问题不足,将人民陪审员事实认定的职能进一步细化和确认,促使人民陪审员敢于认定,提高陪审制度的民主性和公正性。The people’s assessor system in China is a basic system of public participation in justice,and its main function is to promote judicial democracy and judicial justice.In recent years,China has made significant changes to the function of people’s assessors in the seven-member collegial court by introducing a series of laws and regulations,limiting the function of people’s assessors mainly to the level of fact determination.The purpose of the reform is to change the phenomenon of jurors“accompanying without trial,trial without deliberation”,“resident judges”and“supernumerary judges”,which has been quite effective so far.On the premise that the basic framework of the people’s jury system is established,we can learn from the advanced experience of overseas juries,improve the corresponding supporting system to make up for the residual problems in judicial practice,further refine and confirm the function of people’s jurors in determining facts,and encourage people’s jurors to dare to determine and improve the democracy and fairness of the jury system.

关 键 词：陪审制度 七人合议庭 事实认定 法官指引制度 

分 类 号：D926.2[政治法律—法学]