检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:沈晓娜 刘文军 林洪盛 鲁秋香 刘利敏[1] SHEN Xiaona;LIU Wenjun;LIN Hongsheng;LU Qiuxiang;LIU Limin(The 910th Hospital of China Joint Logistics Support Force of the PLA,Quanzhou 362000,China;不详)
机构地区:[1]中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九一〇医院,福建泉州362000 [2]泉州市第一医院
出 处:《中外医学研究》2023年第16期99-103,共5页CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
基 金:泉州市科技计划项目(2017Z019)。
摘 要:目的:探究分级气道护理对成批烟雾吸入性损伤患者希望水平、效能感状态、生存质量的影响。方法:选择2020年3月—2022年3月中国联勤保障部队第九一〇医院收治的80例成批烟雾吸入性损伤患者为研究对象,根据随机数表法分为对照组和观察组,各40例。对照组进行常规吸入性损伤护理,观察组则进行分级气道护理干预。比较两组护理前后的希望水平(Herth希望量表)、效能感状态[一般自我效能感量表(GSES)]及生存质量[世界卫生组织生存质量量表(WHOQOL-100)]及患者对护理模式的总满意率。结果:护理前,两组Herth希望量表、GSES量表及WHOQOL-100量表评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。护理1周、2周、3周后,两组Herth希望量表、GSES量表及WHOQOL-100量表结果均优于护理前,且观察组的上述结果均显著优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组护理总满意率显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:分级气道护理可显著改善成批烟雾吸入性损伤患者的希望水平、效能感状态及生存质量,更受患者认可。Objective:To explore the impact of graded airway care on the hope level,efficacy status,and quality of life in patients with smoke inhalation injury.Method:A total of 80 patients with smoke inhalation injury admitted to the 910th Hospital of the China Joint Logistics Support Force of the PLA from March 2020 to March 2022 were selected as the study objects,they were randomly divided into control group and observation group,with 40 patients in each group.The control group received routine inhalation injury care,while the observation group received graded airway care intervention.The hope level(Herth hope scale),efficacy status[general self-efficacy scale(GSES)],quality of life[WHO quality of life scale-100(WHOQOL-100)]and the total satisfaction rate of patients with the care model were compared between the two groups before and after care.Result:Before care,there were no statistically significant differences in the scores of the Herth hope scale,GSES scale,and WHOQOL-100 scale between the two groups(P>0.05).After 1 week,2 weeks,and 3 weeks of care,the results of the Herth hope scale,GSES scale,and WHOQOL-100 scale in both groups were better than those before care,and the above results in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The overall satisfaction rate of care in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Graded airway care can significantly improve the hope level,efficacy status,and quality of life in patients with smoke inhalation injury,and is more recognized by patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.130