行政赔偿诉讼证明责任分配的二元建构--兼评2022年行政赔偿司法解释第11、12条  

The Dual Construction of Burden of Proof Distribution in the Administrative Compensation Litigation——Comments on Article 11 and Article 12 of the 2022 Judicial Interpretation

作　　者：邓慧 Deng Hui

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院

出　　处：《北京政法职业学院学报》2023年第2期71-78,共8页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law

摘　　要：行政赔偿诉讼的证明责任分配应当进行“原则+规范”的二元建构。原则层面,规范说具有普适性和明确性优势,值得采纳。规范层面,我国现行立法“原则与例外”式证明责任分配规则体系基本符合规范说的要求,但由于需要同时适用行政诉讼法与国家赔偿法,而两法本身存在逻辑冲突并伴随具体规则的差异,使得同时适用模式面临困境。对此,应打破两法并立的格局,确立国家赔偿法的唯一基础规范地位,并将司法解释的内容纳入其中,赋予其法律地位。The distribution of the burden of proof in administrative compensation litigation shall carry out the dual construction of"principle and norm".At the level of principle,normative theory has the advantage of universality and clarity,and is worth adopting.At the normative level,our current“principles and exceptions”legislative system basically reflects the requirements of normative theory.However,the mode of simultaneously applying the Administrative Litigation Law and the State Compensation Law in the practical field of administrative compensation litigation faces dilemma,due to the logical conflicts between the two laws themselves as well as the accompanied differences in specific rules.To solve this problem,it is necessary to break the pattern of the coexistence of the two laws,make the State Compensation Law as the only legislative authority of the distribution of the burden of proof and absorb the contents of the judicial interpretation.

关 键 词：行政赔偿诉讼 主观证明责任 客观证明责任 规范说 

分 类 号：D922[政治法律—法学]