检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高婷 Gao Ting
机构地区:[1]上海政法学院法律学院
出 处:《北京政法职业学院学报》2023年第2期88-93,共6页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law
摘 要:在数字经济时代,人脸识别为社会管理等领域带来便利,但也带来隐私、财产、伦理等侵权风险,适用侵权责任法规制是防范风险的重要路径。在侵权领域采取过错推定的归责原则,并区分收集照片与收集人脸信息的不同认定违法性。就因果关系而言,适用传统的相当因果关系理论即可对侵权人追责。人脸识别信息损害的后果通常不马上显像出来,而表现于泄露后被他人误用的风险,应作灵活解释,在一定条件下认可未来风险构成损害。In the era of digital economy,facial recognition brings convenience to social management and other fields,but it also brings infringement risks such as privacy,property,and ethics.The application of tort liability law regulations is an important path to prevent risks.In the field of infringement,the principle of imputing fault presumption is adopted,and the different illegality of collecting photos and face information is distinguished.In terms of causality,the tortfeasor can be held accountable by applying the traditional theory of equivalent causality.The consequences of facial recognition information damage are usually not immediately apparent,and the performance of the risk of misuse by others after disclosure should be interpreted flexibly to recognize the future risk of damage under certain conditions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62