检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵新宇 闵锦忠[1] 朱利剑 张晨 ZHAO Xinyu;MIN Jinzhong;ZHU Lijian;ZHANG Chen(Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters/Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster,Ministry of Education,Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology,Nanjing 210044,China;Inner Mongolia Tongliao Meteorological Service,Tongliao 028000,China)
机构地区:[1]南京信息工程大学气象灾害预报预警与评估协同创新中心/气象灾害教育部重点实验室,江苏南京210044 [2]内蒙古通辽市气象局,内蒙古通辽028000
出 处:《大气科学学报》2023年第3期453-465,共13页Transactions of Atmospheric Sciences
基 金:国家自然科学基金重大资助项目(42192553)。
摘 要:利用FNL全球再分析资料(Final Operational Global Analysis)、探空资料对2019年6—9月位于中国华北地区20个站点共5种型号(CFL-06、GLC-24、TWP8-L、CFL-03、CLC-11-D)的边界层风廓线雷达资料进行了质量评估。结果表明:各型号雷达均具有较强的探测能力,但不同雷达在水平风资料数据获取率以及有效探测高度上差异极大。不区分天气状况时,所有型号雷达均为V风质量优于U风质量。TWP8-L雷达U风测风质量相对最佳,CFL-03雷达紧随其后,GLC-24雷达U风测风质量最差,V风质量则差异不大,U风数据使用前需进行偏差订正以及质量控制。风廓线雷达观测对于降水较为敏感,降水使各型号雷达数据获取率在底层减小,中高层增加,增幅最大达到53%,但探测能力加强并不代表测风质量增加,统计结果表明降水是造成U风平均误差以及均方根误差较高的重要原因,其中,GLC-24、CLC-11-D雷达对降水最为敏感,降水状态相较于非降水状态均方根误差增幅均达到了5.5 m/s以上,降水情况下的U风及V风资料需进行进一步质量控制才可使用。A wind profiler radar is a new type of Doppler wind radar designed to measure the horizontal wind vectors,and are able to provide wind profiles at various elevations with high temporal and spatial resolution.It plays an increasingly important role in China s Meteorological business.However,the quality of wind profiler radar data varies widely considering the different types of radars deployed in China.To better utilize these data in numerical weather prediction(NWP),this study assesses the data quality from five different types of wind profiler radars(i.e.,CFL-06,GLC-24,TWP8-L,CFL-03 and CLC-11-D)at 20 stations in North China from June to September 2019.Results show that each type of profiler has strong detection ability,but different profilers have great differences in data acquisition rate and effective detection height.Without considering the influence of precipitation,the data quality of V-wind is better than that of U-wind for all types of profilers.In all air conditions,the quality of u-wind data from TWP8-L profiler is relatively the best,followed by CFL-03 radar,the quality of U-wind data from GLC-24 radar is the worst.The differences in V-wind data is not noticeable,while bias correction and quality control are necessary for U-wind data.The data quality of wind profile radar is quite sensitive to precipitation,which reduces the data acquisition rates at low levels and increases the data acquisition rates at the middle and high levels,with the maximum increase of 53%.The statistical results indicate precipitation is responsible for the large mean errors and root mean square errors(RMSEs)of u wind data.GLC-24 and CLC-11-D profilers are the most sensitive to precipitation.The RMSEs are increased by 5.5 m/s in precipitation regions as compared to non-precipitation regions.The U-wind and V-wind data in precipitation regions requires further quality control procedure.
分 类 号:P412.25[天文地球—大气科学及气象学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171