数据“三权分置”的法律表达  

Legal expression of"separation of three rights"in data

作　　者：曹新舒 Cao Xinshu(Civil and Commercial Law School,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学民商法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《网络安全与数据治理》2023年第6期37-41,47,共6页CYBER SECURITY AND DATA GOVERNANCE

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(20YJC820064);重庆市哲学社会科学规划项目(2021PY76)。

摘　　要：数据“三权分置”的法律表达过程中,确权主义与行为主义的对立与竞争应逐渐消退,二者主辅关系的认识也应逐渐扬弃。为确保重大改革于法有据,应基于《民法典》第187条建立确权主义与行为主义的位阶关系。在此位阶关系的认识下,“数据资源持有权”的解释应侧重范围限缩与客体特定,“数据加工使用权”的解释应侧重基于交换关系的场景限定,“数据产品经营权”的解释应侧重“向公法义务接轨”的功能限定。In the process of legal expression of data"separation of three rights",the opposition and competition between property right paradigm and behavior regulation paradigm should gradually fade away,and the understanding of the main and auxiliary relationship between them should also be gradually discarded.In order to ensure that major reforms are well-founded in law,we should establish the hierarchical relationship between property right paradigm and behavior regulation paradigm based on Article 187 of the Civil Code.Under the understanding of this hierarchical relationship,the interpretation of"the right to hold data resources"should focus on the limitation of scope and the specificity of objects,the interpretation of"the right to use data processing"should focus on the scene limitation based on the exchange relationship,and the interpretation of"the right to operate data products"should focus on the function limitation of"connecting with public law obligations".

关 键 词：数据产权 三权分置 确权主义 行为主义 

分 类 号：D923.8[政治法律—民商法学]