检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵馨冉 王竹青[1] ZHAO Xin-ran;WANG Zhu-qing(College of Arts and Law,University of Science and Technology Beijing,Beijing 100083,China)
出 处:《海南开放大学学报》2023年第2期115-122,共8页Journal of Hainan Open University
摘 要:违约方解除合同作为解决合同僵局的新路径,是司法实践的产物。《民法典》对“违约方合同解除权”的适用及其作用机制尚且未做出明确规定,学术界对该问题的争议较大。因此对合同僵局现有应对机制凸显的困境进行反思,对适用“违约方合同解除权”的学界观点进行分析,有助于厘清“违约方合同解除权”的权利属性,进而推动“违约方合同解除权”的作用机制在理论和实践中得到完善。As a new way to resolve the deadlock in the contract,the termination of the contract by the breaching party is a product of judicial practice.The Civil Code has not clearly stipulated the application of the"breaching party's right to cancel the contract"and its mechanism of function,and the academic community has a great deal of controversy over this issue.Therefore,reflecting on the dilemma highlighted by the existing response mechanism of contract deadlock,and analyzing the academic viewpoint of applying the"breaching party's right to cancel the contract",it is helpful to clarify the right attributes of the"breaching party's right to cancel the contract",and then promote the improvement of the mechanism of"breaching party's right to cancel the contract"in theory and practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.34.191