帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪中“明知”的认定  

The Cognizance of“Knowing”in the Crime of Information Network Criminal Activity

作　　者：何通天 李军[1] HE Tong-tian;LI Jun(School of Public Administration&Law,Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University,Fuzhou 305300,China)

机构地区：[1]福建农林大学公共管理与法学院,福建福州350000

出　　处：《海南开放大学学报》2023年第2期130-138,共9页Journal of Hainan Open University

基　　金：2021年福建省社科规划项目“网络犯罪扩张的类型化规制研究”(项目编号:FJ2021BF015)。

摘　　要：在帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪呈现爆发式增长的背后,该罪主观“明知”的判断长期以来都是一项难题。司法机关在认定主观“明知”时,往往无统一的标准,这导致现实中对“明知”的认定略显恣意,有扩大刑事处罚范围之嫌。为解决上述问题首先应当明确“明知”的具体内涵,特别对是否包含“可能知道”进行明晰。其次,在刑事诉讼中减少推定的适用,更多采用推论的方式认定主观犯意,减少误判的可能性。最后要建立一种综合性证明模式,通过对牵连事实的证据补强来构建事件的完整经过,形成较为完整的证据链,使得推论的结果最终达到高度盖然,以此从根本上解决“明知”认定的难题。Behind the explosive growth of the crime of helping the information network crime,the judgment of the subjective“Knowing”of the crime has been a long-term problem.The judiciary often doesn't have certain standards when determining the subjective"Knowing",which leads to the fact that the identification of knowing is somewhat arbitrary and has the suspicion of expanding the scope of criminal punishment.In order to solve the above problems,we should first clarify the specific connotation of“Knowing”,especially whether it includes“Possible knowing”.Secondly,in the criminal proceedings to reduce the application of presumption,more use of inference to determine the subjective offense,reduce the possibility of misjudgment.Finally,we should establish a comprehensive mode of proof,through the evidence of the implicated facts to construct the complete course of events,and form a more complete chain of evidence,so that the results of the inference finally reach a high degree of probability to solve the“Knowing”that the problem.

关 键 词：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 可能知道 推定 推论 综合证明模式 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]